public-xg-lld@w3.org from August 2010 by author

Anette Seiler

• Introduction: hbz and Anette Seiler (Thursday, 26 August)

Antoine Isaac

• Re: Use Case template (Tuesday, 31 August)
• Re: Similar Use cases? (Tuesday, 31 August)
• Re: F2F Pittsburgh attendance (Monday, 30 August)
• Note on use case (data) scope (Friday, 27 August)
• Re: F2F Pittsburgh attendance (Friday, 27 August)
• Re: Cataloguing terminology (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Use case: Europeana (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Agenda - August 26 2010 - LLD XG telecon - 1400 UTC (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Re: Meeting minutes: 2010-08-18 (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Re: linkable library data (Sunday, 22 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Saturday, 14 August)
• Re: Possible use case (Saturday, 14 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Saturday, 14 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Wednesday, 11 August)
• Re: Is unique Work identifiers as use case? (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Slides on the XG (Monday, 2 August)
• Re: Use case template -- user needs (Monday, 2 August)
• Re: Use case template -- user needs (Monday, 2 August)

Bernard Vatant

• Use Case Vocabulary Merging (Tuesday, 31 August)
• Re: Possible use case (Friday, 13 August)
• Re: Slides on the XG (Monday, 2 August)

Ed Summers

• Use Case: National Digital Newspaper Program (Thursday, 26 August)
• Re: linkable library data (Sunday, 22 August)

Emmanuelle Bermes

• Re: Use Case template (Tuesday, 31 August)
• Re: F2F Pittsburgh attendance (Friday, 27 August)
• Re: Similar Use cases? (Friday, 27 August)
• F2F Pittsburgh attendance (Friday, 27 August)
• Re: Pittsburgh meeting logistics (22 Oct and 23-24 Oct) (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Re: Meeting minutes: 2010-08-18 (Friday, 20 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Friday, 13 August)

Felix Sasaki

• Use case: Language Technology (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Re: Ontology for Media Resource 1.0 (Monday, 16 August)

gordon@gordondunsire.com

• Re: Cataloguing terminology (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Cataloguing terminology (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Re: Meeting minutes: 2010-08-18 (Friday, 20 August)
• Paper on IFLA standards and Semantic Web (Wednesday, 4 August)

Haffner, Alexander

• AW: [Spam-Wahrscheinlichkeit=45]Re: Similar Use cases? (Friday, 27 August)
• Use Case template (Friday, 27 August)

Herbert Van de Sompel

• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)

Jodi Schneider

• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Monday, 9 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Monday, 9 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Monday, 9 August)

Jon Phipps

• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Friday, 13 August)

Kai Eckert

• Action "Editing use-case" delivered, Regrets for next two weeks (Thursday, 26 August)

Karen Coyle

• Re: Similar Use cases? (Friday, 27 August)
• Re: linkable library data (Monday, 23 August)
• Re: linkable library data (Sunday, 22 August)
• Re: linkable library data (Sunday, 22 August)
• linkable library data (Sunday, 22 August)
• Re: Ontology for Media Resource 1.0 (Saturday, 14 August)
• Re: Possible use case (Saturday, 14 August)
• Re: Possible use case (Friday, 13 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Friday, 13 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• Possible use case (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Wednesday, 11 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Tuesday, 10 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Monday, 9 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Monday, 9 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Saturday, 7 August)

Matola, Tod

• Re: Similar Use cases? (Friday, 27 August)
• Similar Use cases? (Wednesday, 25 August)
• Is unique Work identifiers as use case? (Tuesday, 10 August)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: linkable library data (Sunday, 22 August)

Neubert Joachim

• SWIB10 Conference in Cologne, 29./30. Nov. (Friday, 13 August)
• Use Case Publishing 20th Century Press Archives / Template (Wednesday, 11 August)

Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress

• Multiple Regrets (Tuesday, 31 August)
• RE: F2F Pittsburgh attendance (Monday, 30 August)
• RE: Pittsburgh meeting logistics (22 Oct and 23-24 Oct) (Tuesday, 24 August)

Ross Singer

• Correction, yesterday was the 19th. (Friday, 20 August)
• Meeting minutes: 2010-08-18 (Friday, 20 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Wednesday, 11 August)

Thomas Baker

• Re: Pittsburgh meeting logistics (22 Oct and 23-24 Oct) (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Pittsburgh meeting logistics (22 Oct and 23-24 Oct) (Tuesday, 24 August)
• Agenda - August 19 2010 - LLD XG telecon - 1400 UTC (Tuesday, 17 August)
• Re: Ontology for Media Resource 1.0 (Saturday, 14 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)

William Waites

• Re: Possible use case (Saturday, 14 August)
• Re: Possible use case (Saturday, 14 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Tuesday, 10 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Monday, 9 August)
• Fwd: Cataloguing Bibliographic Data with Natural Language and RDF (Monday, 9 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Monday, 9 August)

Young,Jeff (OR)

• RE: Use Case template (Tuesday, 31 August)
• Minutes of 2010-07-26 LLD meeting (Friday, 27 August)
• RE: Ontology for Media Resource 1.0 (Saturday, 14 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Saturday, 14 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Friday, 13 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Wednesday, 11 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Wednesday, 11 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Wednesday, 11 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Tuesday, 10 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Monday, 9 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Monday, 9 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Monday, 9 August)
• RE: is FRBR relevant? (Saturday, 7 August)
• is FRBR relevant? (Saturday, 7 August)

ZENG, MARCIA

• FW: Comments from the LLD XG Re: [Digipres] NISO Seeking Feedback on Institutional Identifier Midterm Report -- responses needed by August 2 (Thursday, 19 August)
• Re: is FRBR relevant? (Thursday, 12 August)
• Re: Institutional Identifier Re: [Digipres] NISO Seeking Feedback on Institutional Identifier Midterm Report -- responses needed by August 2 (Monday, 2 August)

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 August 2010 21:00:02 UTC