W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > August 2010

Re: Possible use case

From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:22:42 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTimhcUgqQ=mb_xBrP5=oWC3g0VkW68tPc9ADADQo@mail.gmail.com>
To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Cc: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Hi Karen

+1 for this.

Of interest also is how "subjects" are or will be included in the RDF
publication.
In your example of "Edition" the subject value is a blank node representing
a DDC classification in DC namespace.
It's OK although direct URIs for DDC entities would be simpler (things we
could consider in the use case)

OTOH at http://openlibrary.org/subjects/halley's_comet I don't see any
indication of an RDF description, but in records such as
http://openlibrary.org/works/OL141696W.rdf the subject "Halley's comet" is
plain text value of dc:subject.

Those examples point at central issues re. names vs URIs vs identifiers and
definitely it seems a good use case I would gladly work on.

Bernard


2010/8/12 Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>

> I have a possible use case but it may be too specific. I was thinking of
> writing up the actual effort being made to export Open Library entities in
> RDF. There are three entities: Work, Author, and Edition. They do not
> strictly follow library practice, which is what makes them interesting as
> cases, IMO.
>
> Here are some examples. Assume that the RDF in each case is only one
> possible solution:
>
> Author in UI: http://openlibrary.org/authors/OL22022A/Barbara_Cartland
> Author RDF: http://openlibrary.org/authors/OL22022A.rdf
>
> Work in UI: http://openlibrary.org/works/OL6037025W/Code
> Work in RDF: http://openlibrary.org/works/OL6037025W.rdf
>
> Edition (Manifestation + Expression, more or less) in UI:
>   http://openlibrary.org/books/OL6807502M/Code
> Edition in RDF: http://openlibrary.org/books/OL6807502M.rdf
>
> Some of the issues that the case would raise are:
>  There are many versions of FRBR - does it matter which one you use?
>  We have frbr:Person, RDA:Person, foaf:Person, FRAD:Person.... again, how
> to decide?
>  There are many elements in library data that do not yet have an
> identifier; how does one approach that?
>
> Or is this too specific for a use case?
>
> --
> Karen Coyle
> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
> ph: 1-510-540-7596
> m: 1-510-435-8234
> skype: kcoylenet
>
>
>


-- 
Bernard Vatant
Senior Consultant
Vocabulary & Data Engineering
Tel:       +33 (0) 971 488 459
Mail:     bernard.vatant@mondeca.com
----------------------------------------------------
Mondeca
3, cité Nollez 75018 Paris France
Web:    http://www.mondeca.com
Blog:    http://mondeca.wordpress.com
----------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 13 August 2010 08:23:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 13 August 2010 08:23:16 GMT