W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > August 2010

Re: linkable library data

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 09:55:33 -0700
Message-ID: <20100822095533.9ozjvyi2xwc84cc0@kcoyle.net>
To: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Cc: public-xg-lld <public-xg-lld@w3.org>
Quoting Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>:

> Hello Karen,


> My only comment on the content of your proposal would be on "linked
> data" vs. "RDF data" vs. "linkable data". Having RDF data available
> does not mean that it is publish as linked data stricto sensu [1],
> which I guess is captured by your "linkable data" expression.

Exactly.


> Maybe it
> would be useful to be more explicit, and ask "how" the data is
> available (RDF dump, full linked data).


Yes, I was going to put a comment in the "access" area to say *how*  
the data is available, e.g. a triple-store file, individual rdf/xml  
entries, etc. Perhaps this should be a section of its own?

>
>
> I would have another comment on the process, though. Crucial as this
> effort will be, I'd be more comfortable if it was not interfering with
> the one of gathering use cases. If we send out two "calls for
> contribution" at the same time, this might be confusing for the
> potential contributors. They could think that we're just happy with
> data description (which is always easier) while we want a bit more.


Sure. I can do the template while I have it in mind, but keep it  
hidden. (I have to do things while I am thinking of them or they are  
GONE.)

>
> Further, for now the list of stuff available (at least as "real" linked
> data) is not extremely long, cf. the pointers in my LLD talk [2] (in
> which I stole some stuff from others, especially Ross' cloud).

I figured I would seed it with some of the few known sets, but by  
putting it on the public pages the creators of those data sets could  
add more detail or bring the entries up to date.

kc

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet
Received on Sunday, 22 August 2010 16:56:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 22 August 2010 16:56:14 GMT