W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-xg-lld@w3.org > August 2010

Re: is FRBR relevant?

From: Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:40:31 -0400
To: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Cc: "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org>, Jodi Schneider <jodi.schneider@deri.org>, public-xg-lld@w3.org
Message-ID: <20100812194031.GA1124@octavius>
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 12:35:06PM -0700, Karen Coyle wrote:
> >Also, I thought frsad:Nomen was analogous to a SKOS label,
> >not a concept (i.e., the range of frsad:soundLabel, not
> >the domain).  Do I have it backwards?
> Tom, the definitions of Thema and Nomen are:
> Thema: any entity used as a subject of a work
> Nomen: any sign or sequence of signs (alphanumeric characters,  
> symbols, sound, etc.) by
> which a thema is known, referred to or addressed as.
> I read this to mean that Thema = concept, but I'm less sure about  
> Nomen because it appears that the term Nomen covers both identifier  
> and a prefLabel (see section 6.2 where it gives the attributes of  
> Nomen as "identifier" and "controlled name").

Thank you, Karen.

I'm not seeing any reason why Antoine's suggested:

    skosxl:Label rdfs:subClassOf frsad:Nomen .

would not work.


Thomas Baker <tbaker@tbaker.de>
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2010 19:41:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:35:55 UTC