public-ws-policy@w3.org from May 2007 by author

Abbie Barbir

• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• May F2F update hosted by Nortel (Wednesday, 2 May)
• RE: Collections: Sets, bags or something else? (Wednesday, 2 May)

Anish Karmarkar

• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)

Anthony Nadalin

• Re: Client policy processing (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: WS-Policy and interopearbility (Was: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my!) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Client policy processing (Wednesday, 9 May)

Ashok Malhotra

• RE: New issue on duplicate assertions of a single type in an alternative: 4583 (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: New issue on duplicate assertions of a single type in an alternative: 4583 (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Questions on normal forms (Tuesday, 29 May)
• New issue on duplicate assertions of a single type in an alternative: 4583 (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Client policy processing (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: [Bug 4555] Should policy intersection be called policy intersection? (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Performance problems with policy intersection (Monday, 14 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: WS-Policy and interopearbility (Was: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my!) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: ACTION-294 Ashok to open a CR issue with text to define "collection" (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Friday, 4 May)
• ACTION-294 Ashok to open a CR issue with text to define "collection" (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: [Bug 4522] Namespace problems in the WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 External Attachment Test Cases. (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: Utility of Ignorable? (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: [Bug 4522] Namespace problems in the WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 External Attachment Test Cases. (Thursday, 3 May)
• WSDL 1.1 External Attachment Tests (Wednesday, 2 May)
• RE: Collections: Sets, bags or something else? (Tuesday, 1 May)

Asir Vedamuthu

• Summary: Test Suite Issues (Wednesday, 23 May)
• FW: [Bug 4568] Incorrect namespaces in testcases (Wednesday, 23 May)
• FW: [Bug 4572] Typo in wsp:URI in wsdl2.0 for round4 (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: FW: [Bug 4567] Typo in wsdl2.0 attachment URIs (Wednesday, 23 May)
• FW: [Bug 4567] Typo in wsdl2.0 attachment URIs (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: [Bug 4554] Configurability and comformance of intersection algorithm (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Wednesday, 23 May)
• FW: [Bug 4575] Minor Bugs in Round 2 WSDL 20 Test Cases from WSO2/Manjula (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Reporting Interop / Unit Test Results 4 CR Dashboard (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: [NEW ISSUE] 4561 clarification of domain-specific processing (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: RE: WS-Addressing 1.0 Metadata second last call (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Monday, 21 May)
• FW: [Bug 4571] round2 wsdl2 needs QNames not NCNames (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: WSDL 2.0 external attachment (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Action-297 - Example Policies that Don't Interesect (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: [Bug 4555] Should policy intersection be called policy intersection? (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: WS-Addressing 1.0 Metadata second last call (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: [Bug 4554] Configurability and comformance of intersection algorithm (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Wednesday, 16 May)
• FW: [Bug 4553] Exact meaning of "all of the assertions in both alternatives" (Wednesday, 16 May)
• FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Action-297 - Example Policies that Don't Interesect (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Action-295 (was NEW ISSUE - 4556 Editorial Issue from David Hull (Sunday, 13 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: ACTION-294 Ashok to open a CR issue with text to define "collection" (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: [Bug 4522] Namespace problems in the WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 External Attachment Test Cases. (Monday, 7 May)
• RE: [Bug 4522] Namespace problems in the WSDL 1.1 and WSDL 2.0 External Attachment Test Cases. (Friday, 4 May)
• Updated Interop Scenarios - Release 2 (Tuesday, 1 May)
• RE: Collections: Sets, bags or something else? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• RE: Editorial issues (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Action-288 (was RE: [Bug 4479] Editorial, note is obscure or unclear (Tuesday, 1 May)

Bob Freund

• RE: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Monday, 7 May)
• RE: Action-288 (was RE: [Bug 4479] Editorial, note is obscure or unclear (Wednesday, 2 May)

Bob Freund-Hitachi

• WS-Addressing 1.0 Metadata second last call (Wednesday, 16 May)

Charlton Barreto

• RE: Bug 4584 : Clarify how lax mode and ignorable assertions affect the intersection algorithm (Friday, 25 May)

Christopher B Ferris

• [NEW ISSUE] 4592 Incorrect reference content (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Bug 4584 : Clarify how lax mode and ignorable assertions affect the intersection algorithm (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: Additional lax intersection testing (Thursday, 24 May)
• Fw: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: WS-Addressing 1.0 Metadata second last call (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: from the whiteboard f2f dicussion (Thursday, 24 May)
• from the whiteboard f2f dicussion (Wednesday, 23 May)
• [VER 2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG face-to-face meeting 42 - 2007-05-23 and 24 (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: FW: [Bug 4553] Exact meaning of "all of the assertions in both alternatives" (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Monday, 21 May)
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG face-to-face meeting 42 - 2007-05-23 and 24 (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: Client policy processing (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 18 May)
• [NEW ISSUE] 4561 clarification of domain-specific processing (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Monday, 14 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Response to the Last Call comments by WS-Policy to the WS-Addressing Metadata document 1.0 (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• (VER 2) Agenda: WS-Policy WG distributed meeting 40 - 2007-05-09 (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Thursday, 3 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Ferris wsp 5/1/2007: 'Will Not be Applied' (Wednesday, 2 May)
• policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 1 May)

Dale Moberg

• RE: New issue on duplicate assertions of a single type in an alternative: 4583 (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Monday, 14 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• Alternative with neutral language for Issue 4544 (was RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my!) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: WS-Policy and interopearbility (Was: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my!) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)

Daniel Roth

• RE: WS-Policy and interopearbility (Was: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my!) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: WS-Policy and interopearbility (Was: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my!) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: Response to the Last Call comments by WS-Policy to the WS-Addressing Metadata document 1.0 (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Tuesday, 1 May)

David Hull

• Re: Questions on normal forms (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Questions on normal forms (Tuesday, 29 May)
• One more editorial suggestion (Thursday, 24 May)
• AI: Suggestions for explanation of normalization (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: [Bug 4555] Should policy intersection be called policy intersection? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: [Bug 4554] Configurability and comformance of intersection algorithm (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: FW: [Bug 4553] Exact meaning of "all of the assertions in both alternatives" (Tuesday, 22 May)
• One from column A and one from column B (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Comments on "normal form" of policy expressions (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: [Bug 4554] Configurability and comformance of intersection algorithm (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: [Bug 4555] Should policy intersection be called policy intersection? (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: FW: [Bug 4553] Exact meaning of "all of the assertions in both alternatives" (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Extensions and policy intersection (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Collections: Sets, bags or something else? (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Collections: Sets, bags or something else? (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Editorial issues (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Editorial issues (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Collections: Sets, bags or something else? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Comments on "normal form" of policy expressions (Tuesday, 1 May)

David Orchard

• Revised Open World/Closed World positions (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Tuesday, 15 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: Utility of Ignorable? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: AIN, NOBI and composition (Tuesday, 8 May)
• AIN, NOBI and composition (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: Utility of Ignorable? (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Thursday, 3 May)
• Utility of Ignorable? (Thursday, 3 May)
• 4414 finished (Thursday, 3 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Thursday, 3 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Bug 4414 proposed (Tuesday, 1 May)

Doug Davis

• WS-Policy Interop Report (Thursday, 24 May)
• Additional lax intersection testing (Thursday, 24 May)
• WSDL 2.0 external attachment (Friday, 18 May)

Fabian Ritzmann

• Re: ACTION-294 Ashok to open a CR issue with text to define "collection" (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: ACTION-294 Ashok to open a CR issue with text to define "collection" (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Friday, 4 May)

Felix Sasaki

• Re: BEA Reporting Interop Round 1, 2 and 4 Test Results (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Oracle Round 3 Results (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Reporting Interop / Unit Test Results 4 CR Dashboard (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: WS-Policy and interopearbility (Was: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my!) (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Utility of Ignorable? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Utility of Ignorable? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Wednesday, 2 May)

Frederick Hirsch

• Re: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Client policy processing (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Client policy processing (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Policy expression meaning different if in alternative? (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Monday, 7 May)

Katy Warr

• RE: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Wednesday, 9 May)

Maryann Hondo

• updated editors drafts (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Fw: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Monday, 14 May)

Monica J. Martin

• [Fwd: [New Issue] Issue 4579: Context for Parent Policy Assertions and Nested Policy Expressions] (Thursday, 24 May)
• [New Issue] Issue 4579: Context for Parent Policy Assertions and Nested Policy Expressions (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG distributed meeting 41 - 2007-05-16 (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Action 292: Minor Editorial Update on Versioning Text in Primer (New Issue 4559) (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG distributed meeting 41 - 2007-05-16 (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: AIN, NOBI and composition (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Utility of Ignorable? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG distributed meeting 40 - 2007-05-09 (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: AIN, NOBI and composition (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: AIN, NOBI and composition (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: ACTION-294 Ashok to open a CR issue with text to define "collection" (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Ferris wsp 5/1/2007: 'Will Not be Applied' (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Ferris wsp 5/1/2007: 'Will Not be Applied' (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: Bug 4414 proposed - Relationship to Issues 4393 and 4292 (Tuesday, 1 May)

Natale, Bob

• RE: Collections: Sets, bags or something else? (Wednesday, 2 May)

Paul Cotton

• RE: New issue on duplicate assertions of a single type in an alternative: 4583 (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: Comments on "normal form" of policy expressions (Sunday, 20 May)
• WS-Addressing 1.0 Metadata second last call (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: Agenda: WS-Policy interop F2F meeting 2 - 2007-05-23 to 2007-05-25 (Tuesday, 15 May)
• [Bug 4555] Should policy intersection be called policy intersection? (Sunday, 13 May)
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG distributed meeting 41 - 2007-05-16 (Sunday, 13 May)
• [Bug 4553] Exact meaning of "all of the assertions in both alternatives" (Sunday, 13 May)
• [Bug 4554] Configurability and comformance of intersection algorithm (Sunday, 13 May)
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG distributed meeting 40 - 2007-05-09 (Wednesday, 2 May)
• [VER 2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG distributed meeting 39 - 2007-05-02 (Wednesday, 2 May)

Paul Denning

• Round 4 UDDI (Tuesday, 8 May)

Prasad Yendluri

• [NEW ISSUE] 4573 [Guidelines] Uses Guidelines, Best Practices and Good Practices interchangeably (Monday, 21 May)
• Updated Editor's Draft of WS-Policy 1.5 Guidelines Document (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: Utility of Ignorable? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: [SPAM] Round 4 UDDI (Wednesday, 9 May)
• WS-Policy 1.5 Primer Editors draft and Diff (Tuesday, 8 May)

Ram Jeyaraman

• RE: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Wednesday, 9 May)

RAMANA.TURLAPATI@ORACLE.COM

• Oracle Round 3 Results (Friday, 25 May)

Rogers, Tony

• RE: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Client policy processing (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: Client policy processing (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Tuesday, 15 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Tuesday, 15 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Tuesday, 15 May)

Sergey Beryozkin

• RE: Bug 4584 : Clarify how lax mode and ignorable assertions affect the intersection algorithm (Saturday, 26 May)
• RE: Bug 4584 : Clarify how lax mode and ignorable assertions affect the intersection algorithm (Friday, 25 May)
• Bug 4584 : Clarify how lax mode and ignorable assertions affect the intersection algorithm (Friday, 25 May)
• Re: from the whiteboard f2f dicussion (Thursday, 24 May)
• RE: from the whiteboard f2f dicussion (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Utility of Ignorable? (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Utility of Ignorable? (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Bug 4558: Scalability and performance problems with expressing allowable nested policy assertions (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: AIN, NOBI and composition (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: Utility of Ignorable? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: Utility of Ignorable? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• WS-Policy and interopearbility (Was: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my!) (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: Utility of Ignorable? (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Wednesday, 2 May)

Snow, Skip

• RE: FW: [Bug 4552] Should the word "collection" be changed to something more specific? (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Tuesday, 15 May)
• RE: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Tuesday, 15 May)

Symon Chang

• RE: BEA Reporting Interop Round 3 Test Results (Thursday, 31 May)
• BEA Reporting Interop Round 1, 2 and 4 Test Results (Friday, 25 May)
• BEA Reporting Interop Round 3 Test Results (Thursday, 24 May)
• BEA Reporting Interop Round 3 Test Results (Thursday, 24 May)

Tom Rutt

• Re: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Revised positions for closed/open world assumptions (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Are nested assertions part of the policy vocabulary? (Wednesday, 9 May)
• No need for concept of assertion negation (Friday, 4 May)

Toufic Boubez

• [NEW ISSUE] 4566 Guideline G2 to be reconsidered (Friday, 18 May)

William Henry

• Re: policy vocabulary, will not be applied, oh my! (Thursday, 3 May)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 May 2007 22:38:11 UTC