public-openannotation@w3.org from January 2013 by author

Anna Gerber

• Re: Style CSS Challenge! (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Style CSS Challenge! (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Plain textual bodies - summary of arguments and possible solutions (Thursday, 17 January)

Antoine Isaac

• Re: Specific Resource Semantics (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: PAV (was Re: Review of future/core.html) (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Specific Resource Semantics (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Specific Resource Semantics (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Publishing (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: PAV (was Re: Review of future/core.html) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Publishing (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Sect 5.1 of future; Recommended JSON-LD context (Monday, 28 January)
• PAV (was Re: Review of future/core.html) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Appendices (Monday, 28 January)
• New Draft comments: Appendices (Sunday, 27 January)
• New Draft comments: Publishing (Sunday, 27 January)
• New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Saturday, 26 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources - styles (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Thursday, 24 January)
• New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Sunday, 20 January)
• Re: whine about dctypes:Software (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: whine about dctypes:Software (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Sunday, 13 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Saturday, 12 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Motivations in SKOS (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Motivations in SKOS (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: New drafts - general comments and intro (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: New drafts - general comments - extensions/modules (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: New drafts - general comments and intro (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: New drafts - general comments and intro (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Sunday, 6 January)
• New Draft comments: Motivations in SKOS (Sunday, 6 January)
• New Draft comments: textual bodies (Sunday, 6 January)
• New Draft comments: Level 1 (Sunday, 6 January)
• New drafts - general comments and intro (Sunday, 6 January)
• Re: NEW DRAFT: Documentation and OA/OAX (Friday, 4 January)

Bernhard Haslhofer

• Plain textual bodies - summary of arguments and possible solutions (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Wednesday, 9 January)

Bob Morris

• dogfood (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: discussion visualization (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Styles (Tuesday, 29 January)
• JSON-LD recommendations (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Sect 5.1 of future; Recommended JSON-LD context (Monday, 28 January)
• Sect 5.1 of future; Recommended JSON-LD context (Sunday, 27 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Plain textual bodies - summary of arguments and possible solutions (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: Plain textual bodies - summary of arguments and possible solutions (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: whine about dctypes:Software (Wednesday, 16 January)
• confused about the "future" (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Saturday, 12 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Friday, 11 January)
• whine about dctypes:Software (Friday, 11 January)
• dcmi types and Specific Resources (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: New drafts - general comments and intro (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Sunday, 6 January)

Ed Summers

• discussion visualization (Tuesday, 29 January)

Graham Klyne

• Re: Style Issue (Thursday, 3 January)

Herbert van de Sompel

• Re: PAV (was Re: Review of future/core.html) (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Wednesday, 9 January)

Jacco van Ossenbruggen

• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Sunday, 6 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Sunday, 6 January)

James Smith

• Re: New Draft comments: Publishing (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Sect 5.1 of future; Recommended JSON-LD context (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Style Issue (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Style Issue (Thursday, 3 January)

Leyla Jael García Castro

• Re: Comments to “SE Free text tagging a Image” (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Comments to “Bookmarking a Webpage” (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Comments to “SE Free text tagging a Image” (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Comments to “Bookmarking a Webpage” (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Comments to “SE Free text tagging a Image” (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Review of future/core.html (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Review of future/core.html (Monday, 28 January)

Pablo N. Mendes

• 2nd International Workshop on Web of Linked Entities (WoLE2013) (Thursday, 17 January)

Paolo Ciccarese

• Re: Comments to “SE Free text tagging a Image” (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: PAV (was Re: Review of future/core.html) (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Comments to “SE Free text tagging a Image” (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Comments to “Bookmarking a Webpage” (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Comments to “Bookmarking a Webpage” (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Comments to “SE Free text tagging a Image” (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: PAV (was Re: Review of future/core.html) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: PAV (was Re: Review of future/core.html) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Review of future/core.html (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Review of future/core.html (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Review of future/core.html (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: Plain textual bodies - summary of arguments and possible solutions (Friday, 18 January)
• Re: Plain textual bodies - summary of arguments and possible solutions (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: whine about dctypes:Software (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: whine about dctypes:Software (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: confused about the "future" (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: whine about dctypes:Software (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Motivations in SKOS (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Content in RDF status (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: New drafts - general comments and intro (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: New drafts - general comments and intro (Sunday, 6 January)
• NEW DRAFT: Documentation 1.0 alpha (Friday, 4 January)

Raphaël Troncy

• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Friday, 11 January)

Rinke Hoekstra

• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Thursday, 10 January)

Robert Bolick

• Re: Plain textual bodies - summary of arguments and possible solutions (Friday, 18 January)

Robert Sanderson

• Re: Comments to “SE Free text tagging a Image” (Thursday, 31 January)
• Re: Specific Resource Semantics (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: Specific Resource Semantics (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Specific Resource Semantics (Wednesday, 30 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Styles (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Publishing (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Publishing (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Last Ultimate Final Call :) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: PAV (was Re: Review of future/core.html) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Publishing (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Sect 5.1 of future; Recommended JSON-LD context (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Review of future/core.html (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Appendices (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Publishing (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Sect 5.1 of future; Recommended JSON-LD context (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Friday, 25 January)
• Re: Style CSS Challenge! (Thursday, 24 January)
• Style CSS Challenge! (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: Plain textual bodies - summary of arguments and possible solutions (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: whine about dctypes:Software (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: confused about the "future" (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: whine about dctypes:Software (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Tuesday, 15 January)
• Call for Feedback (Monday, 14 January)
• Re: dcmi types and Specific Resources (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: whine about dctypes:Software (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Friday, 11 January)
• Revised Draft Available (Friday, 11 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Motivations in SKOS (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Motivations in SKOS (Thursday, 10 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Tuesday, 8 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Sunday, 6 January)
• Re: Style Issue (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Style Issue (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Style Issue (Thursday, 3 January)
• Re: Style Issue (Wednesday, 2 January)
• Re: Style Issue (Wednesday, 2 January)
• Re: Style Issue (Wednesday, 2 January)

Steve Richard

• RE: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments) (Tuesday, 29 January)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• Re: PAV (was Re: Review of future/core.html) (Tuesday, 29 January)
• Re: Review of future/core.html (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: Review of future/core.html (Monday, 28 January)
• Review of future/core.html (Monday, 28 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Thursday, 24 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: Specific Resources (Tuesday, 22 January)
• Re: whine about dctypes:Software (Thursday, 17 January)
• Re: whine about dctypes:Software (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Wednesday, 16 January)
• Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies (Thursday, 10 January)
• Content in RDF status (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: New drafts - general comments and intro (Wednesday, 9 January)
• Re: New drafts - general comments and intro (Monday, 7 January)

Tim Cole

• RE: Style Issue (Wednesday, 2 January)
• RE: Style Issue (Wednesday, 2 January)
• RE: Style Issue (Wednesday, 2 January)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 January 2013 20:54:31 UTC