W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Comments to “SE Free text tagging a Image”

From: Leyla Jael García Castro <leylajael@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 20:58:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CACLxDV5+G+d7kxD5K92dzbuoja=MCghhZrF-0rWgBPLcGeFFtQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>
Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Hi Paolo,

Ok, I will work on the description and will include a title in the list
related to a selected feature in a 3D protein structure.

Leyla

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Paolo Ciccarese
<paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Leyla,
> thank you for the feedback!
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Leyla Jael García Castro <
> leylajael@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Comments to “SE Free text tagging a Image” at
>> www.w3.org/community/openannotation/wiki/SE_Free_text_tagging_a_Image(and the corresponding section)
>>
>>
>>
>> About the example:
>>
>> The title should be “SE Free text tagging an Image”, the “n” at “an” is
>> missing
>>
>>
>>
>> The description of the example says “A Tag is a label attached to
>> someone or something for identification or other information.” I think a
>> comment could also be used for “other information” so maybe a better
>> description is required? Maybe we can use Wikipedia definition at
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_(metadata)
>>
>
> That is a good idea, would you like to try and update the description?
>
>
>>
>>
>> In the RDF we have <http://alturl.com/wxidq> a dt:Image. Does dt stand
>> for Dublin Core Terms? If it does, then we should use the namespace defined
>> in the Introduction, i.e., dcterms. If it does not, then we should include
>> that namespace in the Introduction or at least in the example
>>
>
> I will introduce a table with the namespaces for each example. It is a
> fair point
>
>
>>
>>
>> A nice variation including the selection of a particular feature within
>> the protein would be nice. That would probably include selectors and
>> specific resources. However, the required selector would be tricky as it is
>> not a portion of the image but a portion of the protein region represented
>> by the image. Maybe that this is a 3D structure and just working with
>> selected pixels in the image, or some kind of freehand selection? I think
>> this would be a nice example. Ideas/suggestions on how to model the
>> selection are welcome.
>>
>
> The tag  on a fragment of an image is certainly something we should add.
> Later in the cookbook scenarios list there is a "Comment on Image
> Fragment", an example with a Tag can be added. In general the list is far
> from being complete. I invite anybody that has ideas in provide new
> scenarios  even by just putting a title in the list.
>
>
>>
>>
>> About the section:
>>
>> We have a section “2.1.3 Tags and Semantic Tags” and there we introduce
>> the class oa:Tag. However, we do not use it in this example; I think it is
>> missing.
>>
>> From the description in the section, it seems that semantic tags are
>> those tags corresponding to URIs? I do not think that is always the case. “
>> http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris” does correspond to a semantic entity
>> but “http://wikipedia.org/Paris/”  does not. I think that for semantic
>> tags only URIs corresponding to semantic entities should be use, any other
>> thoughts about it?
>>
>
> In that particular example I used a free text tag and so I am assuming the
> motivation ao:tagging is enough. However, in general the point you raise is
> a general issue. The current spec allows classifying a URI as semantic tag
> by using oa:Tag. However, the spec says  also:
>
> "It is NOT RECOMMENDED to use the URI of a document as a semantic tag, as
> it might also be used as a regular Body in other Annotations which would
> inherit the oa:Tag class assignment. Instead a new URI should be created
> and linked to the document using an ontology appropriate to the situation."
>
> Which I believe it is addressing what you are asking.
> The problem arises when somebody uses document URIs as tags (not that
> uncommon).
>
>
>
>
>>
>> One question not necessarily related to tags. Could I use annotations to
>> say that a 3D version of that image can be retrieved from “PDB link” in
>> format “XXX”? If yes, how could that being expressed in OA? In general, the
>> question is how to express links to other resources with annotations?
>>
>>
>>
>
> Rob, was that the usage of the oa:linking motivation we removed?
>
> Paolo
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 20:59:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 30 January 2013 20:59:26 GMT