W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Plain textual bodies - summary of arguments and possible solutions

From: Anna Gerber <agerber@itee.uq.edu.au>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 23:24:58 +0000
To: "public-openannotation@w3.org" <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD1EC2E2.C3B0%a.gerber@uq.edu.au>

We have been using approach 2: cnt:ContentAsXML for XHTML literal bodies.
Our annotation client produces XHTML for bodies that contain basic
formatting (e.g. italics to emphasise titles of literary works that are
mentioned in a comment).

Anna

Anna Gerber
Australian Electronic Scholarly Editing (AustESE)
http://itee.uq.edu.au/~eresearch/projects/austese/
eResearch Group, School of Information Technology and Electrical
Engineering (ITEE)
The University of Queensland, Australia



On 18/01/13 2:22 AM, "Robert Sanderson" <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>And the second question I think is clearer:
>
>2. It is unclear how to make annotation with (XML) typed literals.
>
>As previously, no one expressed a real use case for this requirement,
>but it may come up and it would be good to have the answer clear from
>the specification in that case.
>
>There are several options:
>
>1.  Use ContentAsText, with a dc:format of "text/xml".
>2.  Use the cnt:ContentAsXML class
>3.  Use a typed literal as above.
>
>
>
>My own preference for 1 is to use dc:language for consistency with
>dc:format, and I have no significant preference between options 1 and
>2 for the second.
>
>
>Rob
>
Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 23:25:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 17 January 2013 23:25:32 GMT