W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > January 2013

Re: New Draft comments: Multiplicity

From: Paolo Ciccarese <paolo.ciccarese@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 12:03:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFPX2kAOVu3FV-L8iKd5vXX6uGpOaY-OGt9790CnsAsK4VKQxg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Cc: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>
>
> > As a way to alleviate the issue, and also have better matching between OA
> > and RDF, I'd suggest the following "bridging" axioms:
> > rdf:first rdfs:subPropertyOf oa:item .
> > oa:item  owl:propertyChainAxiom  ( rdf:rest  oa:item ) .
> > It think this would provide a sound basis on which the oa:item statements
> > from Fig 4.3 could be derived.
> > [...]
>
> While a great idea, I'm not sure that we can make assertions like this
> about rdf:first?
>
> My preference, especially at this stage, would be to leave it alone
> and add an editors note that ordering in RDF is inherently problematic
> and future specifications may require changes to the mapping.  This
> would also give an opportunity to explain why we introduce the classes
> rather than just using Alt, Bag and List directly.
>
>
+1

Paolo
Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 17:03:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 28 January 2013 17:03:50 GMT