W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > January 2013

Re: PAV (was Re: Review of future/core.html)

From: Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:13:24 +0100
Message-ID: <5106F804.90207@few.vu.nl>
To: <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Hi Paolo,

OK, thanks!
And I'm happy to hear that it's not connected formally to OA yet.
Without even criticizing the model a single second, I see indeed distinctions like "digital resource", "digital artifact", etc. I've fought with these for too long in my domain, and I can see cans of worms flashing around and long reading and discussions coming...

Cheers,

Antoine


> Antoine,
> PAV is a vocabulary that is used by nanopublications and all my previous work.
> Probably will be used in Research Objects as well (Stian can confirm or deny that).
>
> I've created that ontology for the SWAN project in 2006 and it is used since.
> With Stian in particular, we created a new version that is build on top of PROV.
> In fact, PAV is one of the three-four ontologies that has been considered as starting point for the PROV incubator:
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Provenance_Vocabulary_Mappings
>
> However, that said, there is no official connection with Open Annotation.
>
> I am personally using it for everything I do related to annotation as I need to distinguish creators of the digital resource, and creator of the ip or curators of the ip.
> And I also need to distinguish a bunch of other things that are essential for tracking science.
> However, that is, at the moment, out of scope of the specs. Unless something will change in the future.
>
> Just to be clear, I obviously also comply with the Open Annotation provenance model (I use both ways at the same time).
>
> Best,
> Paolo
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac@few.vu.nl>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>
>             Re PAV - Me and Paolo are preparing to release PAV 2.1 at
>              > http://purl.org/pav before end of month (I'll try to squeeze it in
>              > today!) - it includes PROV bindings and HTML view of the ontology, and
>              > would easily do the Darwin example.
>
>         Let me know when this is available and I'll link it in the specification.
>
>
>
>     And maybe this will clarify to me what's the role of PAV in the OA model ;-) This thread is the first time I hear about it, I think...
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Antoine
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Paolo Ciccarese
> http://www.paolociccarese.info/
> Biomedical Informatics Research & Development
> Instructor of Neurology at Harvard Medical School
> Assistant in Neuroscience at Mass General Hospital
> +1-857-366-1524 (mobile) +1-617-768-8744 (office)
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message is intended only for the addressee(s), may contain information that is considered
> to be sensitive or confidential and may not be forwarded or disclosed to any other party without the permission of the sender.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately.
Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 22:13:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 28 January 2013 22:13:53 GMT