W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > January 2013

Re: New Draft comments: textual bodies

From: RaphaŽl Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:04:27 +0100
Message-ID: <50F0380B.5090508@eurecom.fr>
To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
CC: Bernhard Haslhofer <bernhard.haslhofer@cornell.edu>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, public-openannotation@w3.org
> But the difference between
>
> {"@type" : "oa:Annotation",
>   "body" : "I like this.",
>   "target" : {"@id" : "http://flickr.com/images/1"}
> }
>
> and
> {"@type" : "oa:Annotation",
>   "body" : {"chars" : "I like this."},
>   "target" : {"@id" : "http://flickr.com/images/1"}
>
> is hardly a burden to support.

It *IS* ! In LinkedTV, we are producing million of annotations of this 
sort (I'm not kidding), because of keyword spotting on ASR on many many 
shows at the shot level.

What is the cost of not allowing:
"@type" : "oa:Annotation",
    "body" : "I like this.",
    "target" : {"@id" : "http://flickr.com/images/1"}
} ?
Honestly, this is what our tools is already generating anyway.

   RaphaŽl

-- 
RaphaŽl Troncy
EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
Multimedia Communications Department
450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 16:05:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 11 January 2013 16:05:01 GMT