- From: Raphaël Troncy <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:04:27 +0100
- To: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- CC: Bernhard Haslhofer <bernhard.haslhofer@cornell.edu>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, public-openannotation@w3.org
> But the difference between
>
> {"@type" : "oa:Annotation",
> "body" : "I like this.",
> "target" : {"@id" : "http://flickr.com/images/1"}
> }
>
> and
> {"@type" : "oa:Annotation",
> "body" : {"chars" : "I like this."},
> "target" : {"@id" : "http://flickr.com/images/1"}
>
> is hardly a burden to support.
It *IS* ! In LinkedTV, we are producing million of annotations of this
sort (I'm not kidding), because of keyword spotting on ASR on many many
shows at the shot level.
What is the cost of not allowing:
"@type" : "oa:Annotation",
"body" : "I like this.",
"target" : {"@id" : "http://flickr.com/images/1"}
} ?
Honestly, this is what our tools is already generating anyway.
Raphaël
--
Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
Multimedia Communications Department
450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 16:05:01 UTC