- From: Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:41:21 -0700
- To: James Smith <jgsmith@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-openannotation <public-openannotation@w3.org>, Antoine Isaac <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:19 AM, James Smith <jgsmith@gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 28, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Robert Sanderson <azaroth42@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I've added: >>>> The URI SHOULD NOT be resolvable, but if it is, then an RDF >>>> description of the construct MUST be returned. >>> I think the SHOULD is a bit strong, >> I could reduce SHOULD NOT to MAY? eg The URI MAY be resolvable, ... > +1 on changing SHOULD NOT to MAY with the caveat that the RDF returned by dereferencing the URI should reinforce (or not contradict) the RDF in the graph associated with the URI. And ... Done :) Rob
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 15:41:49 UTC