W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-openannotation@w3.org > January 2013

RE: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments)

From: Steve Richard <steve.richard@azgs.az.gov>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:26:36 -0700
To: 'RaphaŽl Troncy' <raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr>, "'Robert Sanderson'" <azaroth42@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Antoine Isaac'" <aisaac@few.vu.nl>, "'public-openannotation'" <public-openannotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003401cdfdd8$d443f880$7ccbe980$@azgs.az.gov>
It looks like INFO is the registered URI scheme, and DOI is a namespace that
uses that scheme. From that point of view, DOI URI's would need to look
something like "INFO:DOI/"DIR"."REG"/"DSS


> -----Original Message-----
> From: RaphaŽl Troncy [mailto:raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr]
> Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 3:53 PM
> To: Robert Sanderson
> Cc: Antoine Isaac; public-openannotation
> Subject: Re: Annotation Concept vs Document (was Level 1 comments)
> 
> Dear Robert,
> 
> > The major issues were:
> > * DOIs are not URIs. eg There's no DOI in:
> > http://www.iana.org/assignments/uri-schemes.html
> 
> I thought it was ... via the info-URI namespace (IETF RFC 4452,
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4452.txt) as noted by the DOI FAQ,
> http://www.doi.org/faq.html ... and of course DOI names can be expressed
as
> URLs, this is the http://dx.doi.org/ resolver. Am I missing something?
> 
>    RaphaŽl
> 
> --
> RaphaŽl Troncy
> EURECOM, Campus SophiaTech
> Multimedia Communications Department
> 450 route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
> e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
> Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
> Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
> Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~troncy/
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2013 04:27:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 January 2013 04:27:09 GMT