Friday, 27 September 2002
- OWL Test Doc
- OWL Test Doc
- RE: test doc update
- RE: test doc update
- Re: test doc update
- RE: test doc update
Thursday, 26 September 2002
- RE: test doc update
- RE: synchronizing about issue 298?
- RE: synchronizing about issue 298?
- RE: test doc update
- Re: test doc update
- test doc update
Wednesday, 25 September 2002
Thursday, 26 September 2002
Wednesday, 25 September 2002
- Comments on WD-webarch-20020830
- Noah marks issues closed (was: Re: Is issue 353 really all set in the text)
Tuesday, 24 September 2002
- RE: Clean up of state tables
- Re: Issue 221: Moving forward
- Re: Clean up of state tables
- You've got questions? We've got weird bits of text that will make no sense in the morning.
Monday, 23 September 2002
- RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text
- RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text
- RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text
- RE: Issue 221: Moving forward
- Re: Clean up of state tables
- RE: Clean up of state tables
- Re: Clean up of state tables
- RE: Clean up of state tables
- Re: Clean up of state tables
- RE: Issue 221: Moving forward
- Re: Issue 221: Moving forward
- Re: "Notes on logic grammars and XML Schema" meets Blindfold
- Re: OWL test cases
- Re: Arbitrary changes to processing model (was: editors on the hook for editorial issues)
- RE: Arbitrary changes to processing model (was: editors on the hook for editorial issues)
- Issue 221: Moving forward
- Clean up of state tables
- RE: Arbitrary changes to processing model (was: editors on the hook for editorial issues)
Sunday, 22 September 2002
Saturday, 21 September 2002
- Re: gpg test
- gpg test
- Re: questions about "Languages with Self-Reference I" (Perlis85)
- Re: questions about "Languages with Self-Reference I" (Perlis85)
- Re: questions about "Languages with Self-Reference I" (Perlis85)
Friday, 20 September 2002
- EARL Homepage Draft
- Request to publish xenc-mediatype-01.txt as InfoRFC and registration
- questions about "Languages with Self-Reference I" (Perlis85)
- Summary of comments about webarch
- Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text
- RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text
- Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- OWL test cases
- Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- Re: Is issue 353 really all set in the text
- RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text
- Is issue 353 really all set in the text
Thursday, 19 September 2002
- Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- RE: Set Those Semantics Free
- RE: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- Re: Set Those Semantics Free
Wednesday, 18 September 2002
- RelaxNG Schema for RSS 1.0 Core
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Time for a name change?
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Time for a name change?
- RE: Set Those Semantics Free
- Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- Fwd: Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Time for a name change?
- Arbitrary changes to processing model (was: editors on the hook for editorial issues)
- Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- RE: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues
Tuesday, 17 September 2002
- RSS: Set Those Semantics Free
- Re: URNs versus URLs for identifiers
- Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- Re: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues
- #rdf-it log - 2002-09-13? - 2002-09-16
- Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1
Monday, 16 September 2002
- Notes in part 2, section 7.1
- Re: [security-services] Why use name-value pairs for modeling attributes?
- Re: [security-services] Why use name-value pairs for modeling attributes?
- Re: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues
- RE: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues
- RE: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues
- Re: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues
- RE: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues
- RE: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues
- Re: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues
- Re: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues
- SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues
Sunday, 15 September 2002
Friday, 13 September 2002
- RE: F2F social arrangements
- Frank's proposed requirements as reworded
- Start/end times for f2f4
- RE: F2F social arrangements
Thursday, 12 September 2002
- DaveH's text
- RE: F2F social arrangements
- #rdf-it log 2002-09-09 - 2002-09-12
- RE: SOAP 1.2 Edtodo list should now be up to date
- RE: F2F social arrangements
- RE: F2F social arrangements
- RE: F2F social arrangements
- RE: F2F social arrangements
- Addition/Correction to Web Authoring FAQ: HTML Tables
- Re: SOAP 1.2 Edtodo list should now be up to date
Wednesday, 11 September 2002
- Small cwm patch: fixing embedded RDF
- RE: SOAP 1.2 Edtodo list should now be up to date
- SOAP 1.2 Edtodo list should now be up to date
- Re: The Syntactic Web
- RE: F2F social arrangements
Tuesday, 10 September 2002
Wednesday, 11 September 2002
Tuesday, 10 September 2002
Saturday, 7 September 2002
Tuesday, 10 September 2002
- RE: Issue 221 resolution text change
- #rdf-it, 7/8 Settembre 2002
- float-displace-block.png version 2
- RE: Issue 221 resolution text change
Monday, 9 September 2002
- RE: Issue 221 resolution text change
- RE: Issue 221 resolution text change
- RE: Issue 221 resolution text change
- Re: Issue 221 resolution text change
- Re: Issue 221 resolution text change
- Re: Issue 221 resolution text change
Sunday, 8 September 2002
Saturday, 7 September 2002
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?
- RE: [RSS-DEV] Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0]
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?
- Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0]
- Multi-namespace architecture, cost etc (was re: Time to move along?)
- RSS and WAP/WML... lessons re HTML and RDF and format divergence?
Friday, 6 September 2002
- RSS 3.0 Parser in Python
- test
- RE: Issue 221 resolution text change
- [www-archive] <none>
- Re: Issue 221 resolution text change
- Re: Issue 221 resolution text change
- Re: Issue 221 resolution text change
- RE: Issue 221 resolution text change
- Re: Issue 221 resolution text change
Thursday, 5 September 2002
- Re: suspicious subscriber to our lists (fwd)
- Name help needed
- Re: Issue 221 resolution text change
- Re: Issue 221 resolution text change
- Re: Issue 221 resolution text change
- Re: Issue 250 resolution
- Issue 221 resolution text change
- Re: Issue 250 resolution
- RE: Issue 250 resolution
- RE: Issue 250 resolution
Wednesday, 4 September 2002
- RE: Issue 250 resolution
- Runtime error...
- Re: SOAP Primer LC issues resolution summary as of 9/3/02
- RE: Added resolution to issue 320
- RE: Change log (was: Diff markup)
- RE: Change log (was: Diff markup)
- Re: Added resolution to issue 320
- RE: Change log (was: Diff markup)
- Re: Change log (was: Diff markup)
- RE: Change log (was: Diff markup)
- Re: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16
- Change log (was: Diff markup)
- Re: Added resolution to issue 320
- Re: env:faultreason or env:faultReason?
- F2F social arrangements (resend)
- Diff markup
- Re: Added resolution to issue 320
Tuesday, 3 September 2002
- RE: Editorial issue 264: Part 0 - section 6 - URIs
- RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16
- SOAP Primer LC issues resolution summary as of 9/3/02
- RE: Is LC issue 309 misdirected at Primer?
- RE: Is LC issue 309 misdirected at Primer?
- RE: Is LC issue 309 misdirected at Primer?
- F2F social arrangements
- Is LC issue 309 misdirected at Primer?
- env:faultreason or env:faultReason?
- Regenerated HTML for Part 1 & 2
- Re: Remaining open editorial issues
- RE: We're done with the edits
- RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16
- RE: Remaining open editorial issues
- RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16
- Re: We're done with the edits
- RE: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand
- We're done with the edits
- Re: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand
- Re: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16
- RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16
- RE: Editorial issue 264: Part 0 - section 6 - URIs
- Re: Editorial issue 264: Part 0 - section 6 - URIs
- Re: Remaining open editorial issues
- Added resolution to issue 320
- Added resolution to issue 284
- FW: Proposals for remaining editorial spec issues
- FW: Proposals for remaining editorial spec issues
- FW: Proposals for remaining editorial spec issues
- FW: Proposals for remaining editorial spec issues
- FW: Proposals for remaining editorial spec issues
- RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16
- RE: Editorial issue 264: Part 0 - section 6 - URIs
Monday, 2 September 2002
- RE: Remaining open editorial issues
- RE: Remaining open editorial issues
- RE: Remaining open editorial issues
- RE: Remaining open editorial issues
- Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16
- Editorial issue 264: Part 0 - section 6 - URIs
- RE: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand
- RE: Remaining open editorial issues
- Remaining open editorial issues
- RE: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand
- Re: Issue 269: charset parameter
- Re: Issue 289: Faults
- Re: Issue 357a: DataEncodingUnknown v SOAPEncodingUnknown
- Re: Issue 265: Feature conflicts
- Re: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand
- Test