RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16 from Henrik Frystyk Nielsen on 2002-09-03 (www-archive@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:20:23 -0700
To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
Cc: "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D08618281@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

If we get pushback then I suggest we add a note pointing out the
dependency chain but not actually incorporate the values. Does that
work?

>I am happy that our spec is complete given what we do 
>reference. However, one of the complaints was the number of 
>levels of indirection between our spec and the piece of text 
>that says UTF-8/UTF-16. 
>
>That said, I'm comfortable with taking no action. How about 
>everyone else?

Henrik

Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 11:20:55 UTC