On Monday, Sep 23, 2002, at 15:19 US/Eastern, Martin Gudgin wrote: >> >> I think we have two options: >> >> (i) rethink the base URI for the states such that they are shared by >> both request-response and soap-response - or - >> (ii) Split section 7.5 into two, one for each state machine. >> >> I'd prefer (i) but LC issue 305 might push our choice to (ii). > > It seems to me that (ii) is probably easier and quicker for us as > editors to implement. > I disagree, (i) is *much* easier editorially, just change a base URI here and there. (ii) is a lot of work, will make the document significantly longer (lots of duplication required) and I hate editing those state transition tables ! Marc. -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Center, Sun Microsystems.Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 15:46:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:31:53 UTC