- From: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 15:46:06 -0400
- To: "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
On Monday, Sep 23, 2002, at 15:19 US/Eastern, Martin Gudgin wrote: >> >> I think we have two options: >> >> (i) rethink the base URI for the states such that they are shared by >> both request-response and soap-response - or - >> (ii) Split section 7.5 into two, one for each state machine. >> >> I'd prefer (i) but LC issue 305 might push our choice to (ii). > > It seems to me that (ii) is probably easier and quicker for us as > editors to implement. > I disagree, (i) is *much* easier editorially, just change a base URI here and there. (ii) is a lot of work, will make the document significantly longer (lots of duplication required) and I hate editing those state transition tables ! Marc. -- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com> XML Technology Center, Sun Microsystems.
Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 15:46:33 UTC