- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 15:18:02 +0200
- To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- CC: Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, Noah Mendelson <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Ok... what about adding the following sentence (*quoted*): "MUST clearly and completely specify the content and semantics of the header blocks used to implement the behavior in question, including if appropriate any modifications to the SOAP Processing model. *The SOAP Processing Model may be changed in arbitrary ways.*" We might wish to add a safety warning. What do you think? Jean-Jacques. Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: > Thanks... Would description of examples of what one can do with features > be primer stuff? > > Henrik > > >>Here's a copy of my original message. Does it make sense? >> >>Jean-Jacques. >> >>Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: >> >>>What's the issue with 280? Is it how we say that even though >> >>there are >> >>>practical limits we don't restrict the ways SOAP may be extended? >>> >>>Henrik >>> >>> >>> >>>>>Ok, I've done mine, except #280 for which I'm awaiting further >>>>>feedback. >>>> >>
Received on Wednesday, 18 September 2002 09:18:08 UTC