- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:20:23 -0700
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
>I've implemented your suggested change s/header/header field/. >Actually, I've swept through the entire spec (part 2) and >repeated the change where appropriate. (BTW, RFC 2616 is >inconsistent in its use of header vs. header field.) Yes, it took a long time to get the terminology down for this distinction in HTTP :( >I have also fixed replaced [SOAP MediaType] with a reference to >appendix A, since the IETF draft is now an empty shell and its >content was moved to this appendix. Good idea >+1 to your other proposals. Thanks! Henrik
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 11:20:55 UTC