W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > September 2002

Re: Added resolution to issue 320

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 09:39:37 +0200
Message-ID: <3D75B8B9.9070606@crf.canon.fr>
To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
CC: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, Nilo Mitra <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, www-archive@w3.org

Yes, definitely worth changing, but maybe with a further tweak to 
the 2nd sentence: "a hierarchical list of SOAP codes [...] is 
included in every SOAP message" invariably makes me think that 
you want to include all possible faults codes in every SOAP 
message, which is evidently not what you're trying to say. Can't 
think of a fix right now.

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote:
> <proposed>
> SOAP fault codes are XML qualified names, and are intended to provide a 
> means by which faults are rigorously classified.   A hierarchical list of 
> SOAP codes and associated supporting information is included in every SOAP 
> fault message, with each such code identifying the fault category at an 
> increasing level of detail.
> (..remaining 2 paras unchanged...)
> </proposed>
> [...]
> What do you all think?  Worth changing?  Further refinements?
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:39:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:31:53 UTC