Hi Jeremy, > here's my latest after I just replied that the attachment was probably not what you intended, I was able to get the here attached document from my local server after w3ccvs checkout (wonderful, isn't it that Web) > lots more tests in it. well, I haven't found them in there but I guess that's easy to fix > I've tidied them up: the remaining "wrong descriptions" errors are a > software bug to do with XML Literals in my code. > > I've added some text which I hope meets your incomplete reasoner > requirement. that's definitely meeting what I intended or it's a positve entailment ;-) > I've added Manifest description section. looks fine to me > References looking OK what about filling the "Missing ref."s with [RDF Test Cases] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/ [Dublin Core] http://dublincore.org/documents/ [N3] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/Primer.html Notation3 Primer - a quick introduction to semantic web using cwm and n3 Tim Berners-Lee, Dan Connolly or w.r.t. to OWL pointing to http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/#FreqLinks1 > Other text is unchanged. > > I need to add an acknowledgement to my host here in Italy. good idea > Time permitting I will add the range examples that came up under issue 5.3. > > Again, I've checked stuff in, but not updated my server. right, I had to read that more carefully > Time permitting I wish to revisit the descriptions of the approved > (Inverse)?Functional tests to take on board Peter's semantic/syntax points. yes, time doen't permit very much -- , Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ (See attached file: main.jsp.html)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:31:53 UTC