- From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 17:08:02 +0200
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- CC: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, W3C Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Sounds good, thanks! noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > In the case > of a re-inserted header, what about (at or near the sentence on > re-inserting indistinguishable headers) "intermediaries SHOULD NOT > reinsert headers that contained processing instructions but SHOULD > instead, as described above(below), fault with a sender fault." > > In other words, you MUST not insert new headers with PIs, you SHOULD NOT > reinsert headers that were received with PIs, (and as we've more or less > agreed) you SHOULD fault if you receive a message with a PI. How's that?
Received on Monday, 9 September 2002 11:08:49 UTC