www-archive@w3.org from September 2002 by author

Aaron Swartz

• You've got questions? We've got weird bits of text that will make no sense in the morning. (Tuesday, 24 September)

Andrew Kuchling

• Small cwm patch: fixing embedded RDF (Wednesday, 11 September)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: ruby put client fragment (Wednesday, 25 September)
• #rdf-it log - 2002-09-13? - 2002-09-16 (Tuesday, 17 September)
• #rdf-it log 2002-09-09 - 2002-09-12 (Thursday, 12 September)
• #rdf-it, 7/8 Settembre 2002 (Tuesday, 10 September)
• Runtime error... (Wednesday, 4 September)

Dan Brickley

• ruby put client fragment (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: gpg test (Saturday, 21 September)
• gpg test (Saturday, 21 September)
• Re: questions about "Languages with Self-Reference I" (Perlis85) (Saturday, 21 September)
• Re: questions about "Languages with Self-Reference I" (Perlis85) (Saturday, 21 September)
• Re: The Syntactic Web (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: [RSS-DEV] Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0] (Saturday, 7 September)
• Re: [RSS-DEV] Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part? (Saturday, 7 September)
• Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0] (Saturday, 7 September)
• Multi-namespace architecture, cost etc (was re: Time to move along?) (Saturday, 7 September)
• RSS and WAP/WML... lessons re HTML and RDF and format divergence? (Saturday, 7 September)

David Booth

• Frank's proposed requirements as reworded (Friday, 13 September)
• DaveH's text (Thursday, 12 September)

David C. Fallside

• Re: SOAP Primer LC issues resolution summary as of 9/3/02 (Wednesday, 4 September)

David Fallside

• RE: synchronizing about issue 298? (Thursday, 26 September)

Dominique Hazaël-Massieux

• Addition/Correction to Web Authoring FAQ: HTML Tables (Thursday, 12 September)

Eve L. Maler

• Re: [security-services] Why use name-value pairs for modeling attributes? (Monday, 16 September)

Graham Klyne

• Comments on WD-webarch-20020830 (Wednesday, 25 September)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• RE: synchronizing about issue 298? (Thursday, 26 September)
• RE: Clean up of state tables (Tuesday, 24 September)
• RE: Issue 221: Moving forward (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Arbitrary changes to processing model (was: editors on the hook for editorial issues) (Monday, 23 September)
• Issue 221: Moving forward (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Arbitrary changes to processing model (was: editors on the hook for editorial issues) (Sunday, 22 September)
• RE: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues (Monday, 16 September)
• RE: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues (Monday, 16 September)
• RE: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues (Monday, 16 September)
• SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues (Monday, 16 September)
• Committed updates to resolution for issue 320 (Sunday, 15 September)
• Two minor editorial changes to part 2 (Sunday, 15 September)
• RE: SOAP 1.2 Edtodo list should now be up to date (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: SOAP 1.2 Edtodo list should now be up to date (Wednesday, 11 September)
• SOAP 1.2 Edtodo list should now be up to date (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Name help needed (Wednesday, 11 September)
• RE: Name help needed (Tuesday, 10 September)
• RE: Issue 221 resolution text change (Tuesday, 10 September)
• RE: Issue 221 resolution text change (Monday, 9 September)
• RE: Issue 221 resolution text change (Monday, 9 September)
• RE: Added resolution to issue 320 (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Change log (was: Diff markup) (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: We're done with the edits (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16 (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Remaining open editorial issues (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16 (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Added resolution to issue 320 (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Added resolution to issue 284 (Tuesday, 3 September)
• FW: Proposals for remaining editorial spec issues (Tuesday, 3 September)
• FW: Proposals for remaining editorial spec issues (Tuesday, 3 September)
• FW: Proposals for remaining editorial spec issues (Tuesday, 3 September)
• FW: Proposals for remaining editorial spec issues (Tuesday, 3 September)
• FW: Proposals for remaining editorial spec issues (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16 (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Editorial issue 264: Part 0 - section 6 - URIs (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Remaining open editorial issues (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Remaining open editorial issues (Monday, 2 September)
• Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16 (Monday, 2 September)
• Editorial issue 264: Part 0 - section 6 - URIs (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand (Monday, 2 September)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Summary of comments about webarch (Friday, 20 September)

Ian Hickson

• float-displace-block.png version 2 (Tuesday, 10 September)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: Issue 221: Moving forward (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: Clean up of state tables (Tuesday, 24 September)
• Re: Arbitrary changes to processing model (was: editors on the hook for editorial issues) (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Is issue 353 really all set in the text (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Thursday, 19 September)
• Arbitrary changes to processing model (was: editors on the hook for editorial issues) (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: SOAP 1.2 Edtodo list should now be up to date (Thursday, 12 September)
• Re: Issue 221 resolution text change (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: Issue 221 resolution text change (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: Issue 221 resolution text change (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: Issue 221 resolution text change (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: Issue 250 resolution (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Change log (was: Diff markup) (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16 (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Change log (was: Diff markup) (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: Added resolution to issue 320 (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: env:faultreason or env:faultReason? (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Regenerated HTML for Part 1 & 2 (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Remaining open editorial issues (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16 (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Editorial issue 264: Part 0 - section 6 - URIs (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Remaining open editorial issues (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Re: Issue 269: charset parameter (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: Issue 289: Faults (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: Issue 357a: DataEncodingUnknown v SOAPEncodingUnknown (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: Issue 265: Feature conflicts (Monday, 2 September)
• Re: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand (Monday, 2 September)

Jeremy Carroll

• OWL Test Doc (Friday, 27 September)
• OWL Test Doc (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: test doc update (Friday, 27 September)
• Re: test doc update (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: test doc update (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: test doc update (Thursday, 26 September)
• test doc update (Thursday, 26 September)
• OWL test cases (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: F2F social arrangements (Friday, 13 September)
• Start/end times for f2f4 (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: F2F social arrangements (Friday, 13 September)
• RE: F2F social arrangements (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: F2F social arrangements (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: F2F social arrangements (Wednesday, 11 September)
• test (Friday, 6 September)
• F2F social arrangements (resend) (Wednesday, 4 September)
• F2F social arrangements (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Test (Monday, 2 September)

Jim Hendler

• Re: The Syntactic Web (Tuesday, 10 September)

Jos De_Roo

• RE: test doc update (Friday, 27 September)
• RE: test doc update (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: test doc update (Thursday, 26 September)
• Re: OWL test cases (Monday, 23 September)

Joseph Reagle

• Request to publish xenc-mediatype-01.txt as InfoRFC and registration (Friday, 20 September)
• RelaxNG Schema for RSS 1.0 Core (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Time for a name change? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Time for a name change? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Fwd: Re: [RSS-DEV] Re: Time for a name change? (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: URNs versus URLs for identifiers (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: [security-services] Why use name-value pairs for modeling attributes? (Monday, 16 September)

Kevin A. Burton

• Re: [RSS-DEV] Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part? (Sunday, 8 September)

Libby Miller

• RE: F2F social arrangements (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: F2F social arrangements (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: F2F social arrangements (Thursday, 12 September)
• RE: F2F social arrangements (Wednesday, 11 September)

Marc Hadley

• Re: Clean up of state tables (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Clean up of state tables (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Clean up of state tables (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Issue 221: Moving forward (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Wednesday, 18 September)
• Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues (Monday, 16 September)
• Re: Issue 221 resolution text change (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: Issue 221 resolution text change (Thursday, 5 September)
• Issue 221 resolution text change (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Added resolution to issue 320 (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: We're done with the edits (Tuesday, 3 September)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Clean up of state tables (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Clean up of state tables (Monday, 23 September)
• Clean up of state tables (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Arbitrary changes to processing model (was: editors on the hook for editorial issues) (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text (Friday, 20 September)
• RE: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Thursday, 19 September)
• RE: Issue 221 resolution text change (Friday, 6 September)
• RE: Issue 250 resolution (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Issue 250 resolution (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Change log (was: Diff markup) (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Change log (was: Diff markup) (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Diff markup (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Is LC issue 309 misdirected at Primer? (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Is LC issue 309 misdirected at Primer? (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand (Tuesday, 3 September)
• We're done with the edits (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16 (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Editorial issue 264: Part 0 - section 6 - URIs (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Remaining open editorial issues (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Remaining open editorial issues (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Remaining open editorial issues (Monday, 2 September)
• Remaining open editorial issues (Monday, 2 September)
• RE: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand (Monday, 2 September)
• Issue 269: charset parameter (Sunday, 1 September)
• Issue 265: Feature conflicts (Sunday, 1 September)
• Issue 357a: DataEncodingUnknown v SOAPEncodingUnknown (Sunday, 1 September)
• Issue 289: Faults (Sunday, 1 September)
• Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand (Sunday, 1 September)

Nilo Mitra (EUS)

• RE: Name help needed (Wednesday, 11 September)
• Name help needed (Thursday, 5 September)
• SOAP Primer LC issues resolution summary as of 9/3/02 (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Is LC issue 309 misdirected at Primer? (Tuesday, 3 September)
• Is LC issue 309 misdirected at Primer? (Tuesday, 3 September)
• env:faultreason or env:faultReason? (Tuesday, 3 September)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Noah marks issues closed (was: Re: Is issue 353 really all set in the text) (Wednesday, 25 September)
• RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Issue 221: Moving forward (Monday, 23 September)
• RE: Is issue 353 really all set in the text (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Friday, 20 September)
• Is issue 353 really all set in the text (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Thursday, 19 September)
• Re: Notes in part 2, section 7.1 (Tuesday, 17 September)
• Re: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues (Monday, 16 September)
• RE: SOAP 1.2 editors on the hook for generating closing text for editorial issues (Monday, 16 September)
• RE: Issue 221 resolution text change (Tuesday, 10 September)
• RE: Issue 221 resolution text change (Monday, 9 September)
• Re: Issue 221 resolution text change (Monday, 9 September)
• RE: Issue 221 resolution text change (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: Issue 221 resolution text change (Friday, 6 September)
• Re: Issue 221 resolution text change (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Issue 221 resolution text change (Thursday, 5 September)
• Re: Issue 250 resolution (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Issue 250 resolution (Thursday, 5 September)
• RE: Change log (was: Diff markup) (Wednesday, 4 September)
• Re: Added resolution to issue 320 (Wednesday, 4 September)
• RE: Editorial issue 264: Part 0 - section 6 - URIs (Tuesday, 3 September)
• RE: Editorial issue 261: Choose character encoding UTF8/16 (Tuesday, 3 September)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• DOM Level 2 HTML schedule (Wednesday, 25 September)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: "Notes on logic grammars and XML Schema" meets Blindfold (Monday, 23 September)
• Re: questions about "Languages with Self-Reference I" (Perlis85) (Saturday, 21 September)
• questions about "Languages with Self-Reference I" (Perlis85) (Friday, 20 September)
• [www-archive] <none> (Friday, 6 September)

Sean B. Palmer

• EARL Homepage Draft (Friday, 20 September)
• Re: Set Those Semantics Free (Thursday, 19 September)
• RSS: Set Those Semantics Free (Tuesday, 17 September)
• RSS 3.0 Parser in Python (Friday, 6 September)

Seth Russell

• Re: [RSS-DEV] Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part? (Saturday, 7 September)

Simon J. Hernandez

• Re: suspicious subscriber to our lists (fwd) (Thursday, 5 September)

Stevan Harnad

• Re: The Syntactic Web (Tuesday, 10 September)

Wendy A Chisholm

• png of rdf validator results for testGroup play (Tuesday, 10 September)

Ziv Caspi

• RE: Set Those Semantics Free (Thursday, 19 September)
• RE: Set Those Semantics Free (Wednesday, 18 September)
• RE: [RSS-DEV] Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0] (Saturday, 7 September)

Last message date: Friday, 27 September 2002 11:44:41 UTC