OK, those proposals haven't shown up in my inbox yet :-( If you can do 284 and 320 today that would be great, although tomorrow would be early enough, I know today is a holiday for you guys. 210 seems to be about attributes while 262 is about whitespace, so I don't think it's a dupe. Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > Sent: 02 September 2002 20:06 > To: Martin Gudgin; W3C Public Archive; Jean-Jacques Moreau; > Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah Mendelson > Subject: RE: Remaining open editorial issues > > > > I just sent out proposals for 261 and 264 and can incorporate > resolutions for 284 and 320 today. 262 seems to be a dupe of 210, no? > > Henrik > > >The following editorial issues still need to be resolved by us and > >incorporated into the spec. > > > >261, 262 and 264 > > > >Editorial issue 284 is closed but the resolution still needs to be > >incorporated into the spec. Issue 320 is closed but the resolution > >still needs to be incorporated into the spec. > > > >I know how I want to resolve 262, and I think I will > incorporate that > >resolution into the proposal I am making regarding Comments, > prefixes, > >namespace attributes and other infosetisms. I believe Henrik will be > >making proposals for closing Issues 261 and 264. > > > >Can someone step up to incorporate the resolutions for 284 and 320? >Received on Monday, 2 September 2002 15:37:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:31:53 UTC