- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 03:22:07 -0700
- To: "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
- Cc: "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>, "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, "Nilo Mitra" <EUSNILM@am1.ericsson.se>, "Noah Mendelson" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Henrik Frystyk Nielsen" <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Cool, now closed in the edtodo. Gudge > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] > Sent: 03 September 2002 10:55 > To: Martin Gudgin > Cc: W3C Public Archive; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah > Mendelson; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > Subject: Re: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand > > > Yep, that's what I'm proposing. > > Martin Gudgin wrote: > > Ahh, OK. I'd not realized that the only place we had the > mismatch was > > the fault code. I agree we should not change at this time. > Close issue > > 288b with no action? > > > > Gudge > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr] > >>Sent: 02 September 2002 14:49 > >>To: Martin Gudgin > >>Cc: W3C Public Archive; Marc Hadley; Nilo Mitra; Noah > >>Mendelson; Henrik Frystyk Nielsen > >>Subject: Re: Issue 288b: mustUnderstand v MusUnderstand > >> > >> > >>Hmmm... all faults start with a capital letter, so for > >>consistency we would also have to rename all other faults. > >>Personally, I'd don't like the current Uppercase convention; but > >>at this stage, I think we should stick with it (and maybe raise a > >>WSDL issue). > >> > >>Jean-Jacques. > >> > >>Martin Gudgin wrote: > >> > >>>I propose we sweep the spec and make sure we use mustUnderstand > >>>everywhere > >>> > >>>Gudge > >>> > >> > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 06:22:31 UTC