Is LC issue 309 misdirected at Primer?

Gentlemen:
Might perhaps LC issue 309 [1] be a more general matter, and misdirected at Part0: Primer by mistake? (The remainder of the originator's comments are on the Primer, from which this one is an excerpt.)
Please clarify,
Thanks
Nilo
[1] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-lc-issues.html#x309

Received on Tuesday, 3 September 2002 15:36:11 UTC