W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-archive@w3.org > September 2002

RE: Issue 221: Moving forward

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 09:19:24 -0700
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D086183BC@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>
Cc: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "W3C Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>

From an editorial POW, I am fine with this reformulation and if we all
think this is within the realm of editorial discretion then we should
just do it.

>"SOAP messages sent by initial SOAP senders MUST NOT contain 
>processing instruction information items. SOAP intermediaries 
>MUST NOT insert 
>processing instruction information items in SOAP messages they 
>relay. SOAP receivers receiving a SOAP message containing a 
>processing instruction information item SHOULD generate a SOAP 
>fault with the Value of Code set to "env:Sender". However, in 
>the case where performance considerations make it impractical 
>for an intermediary to detect processing instruction 
>information items in a message to be relayed, such 
>intermediaries MAY leave the processing instruction 
>information items unchanged in the relayed message."

Received on Monday, 23 September 2002 12:19:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:31:53 UTC