Re: env:faultreason or env:faultReason? from Jean-Jacques Moreau on 2002-09-04 (www-archive@w3.org from September 2002)

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2002 09:27:04 +0200
To: "Nilo Mitra (EUS)" <Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se>
CC: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@sun.com>, Noah Mendelson <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>, W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3D75B5C8.2040506@crf.canon.fr>

Sounds entirely reasonnable, and adherence to our own conventions.

Done.

Nilo Mitra (EUS) wrote:
> In Part 1 section 5.4.2 [1], shouldn't it be env:faultReason ratherthan 
> env:faultreason?
> Please confirm.
> Thanks
> Nilo
>

Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 03:27:05 UTC