Thursday, 1 May 1997
- News from the ERB
- RE: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- RE: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
Wednesday, 30 April 1997
- SGML/XML'97 Lives!!!
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- RE: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- RE: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- RE: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
Tuesday, 29 April 1997
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
Monday, 28 April 1997
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
- Re: XML and STEP
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
- Another XML article
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
- Re: Sudden death: request for missing input
Sunday, 27 April 1997
Friday, 25 April 1997
Monday, 28 April 1997
Saturday, 26 April 1997
Sunday, 27 April 1997
Friday, 25 April 1997
Thursday, 24 April 1997
- Re: New discussions
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Request to relax PCDATA content model restriction
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Sudden Death (Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it)
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
Wednesday, 23 April 1997
- Prod. 46 and empty content of pEntities refered to
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Request to relax PCDATA content model restriction
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: New discussions
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
Tuesday, 22 April 1997
- Re: Request to relax PCDATA content model restriction
- Request to relax PCDATA content model restriction
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
Monday, 21 April 1997
- Re: New discussions
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Error handling in XML
Sunday, 20 April 1997
Monday, 21 April 1997
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: 8879 changes?
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Error handling in XML
Sunday, 20 April 1997
- Re: Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Error handling: yes, I did mean it
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
Saturday, 19 April 1997
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: 8879 changes?
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: New discussions
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Linking to stylesheets in XML
- Re: Error handling in XML
- Error handling in XML
- New discussions
Friday, 18 April 1997
- 8879 changes?
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: New work item for XML group ? (Re: Comments on 31 March spec)
Thursday, 17 April 1997
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: A serious detail point
- Re: A serious detail point
- A serious detail point
Wednesday, 16 April 1997
Tuesday, 15 April 1997
- WEBster mentions XML
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
- wchar_t & Unicode in Word 97(Re: New work item for XML group ?)
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
Monday, 14 April 1997
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
- So much for my narrowing web search ("XML AND "Meta-language")
- Re: Text of XML article
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
- URN trial (forward)
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
- Re: Another pseudo-element gotcha
- Re: Text of PC Week article
- Re: New work item for XML group ? (Re: Comments on 31 March spec)
- Text of PC Week article
- XML article in PC Week
Sunday, 13 April 1997
Saturday, 12 April 1997
- Re: New work item for XML group ? (Re: Comments on 31 March spec)
- Re: New work item for XML group ? (Re: Comments on 31 March spec)
- Another pseudo-element gotcha
Friday, 11 April 1997
- Re: addressing into char content with xml-link
- Re: addressing into char content with xml-link
- issues for XML-LINK implementation
- Re: addressing into char content with xml-link
- Re: addressing into char content with xml-link
- Re: addressing into char content with xml-link
- addressing into char content with xml-link
Thursday, 10 April 1997
- Re: STEP/XML Presentation to WWW6 Workshop
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: New work item for XML group ? (Re: Comments on 31 March spec)
- Re: Encoding PIs recap. (Re: Comments on 31 March spec)
- Re: New work item for XML group ? (Re: Comments on 31 March spec)
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: New work item for XML group ? (Re: Comments on 31 March spec)
- Encoding PIs recap. (Re: Comments on 31 March spec)
- New work item for XML group ? (Re: Comments on 31 March spec)
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- STEP/XML Presentation to WWW6 Workshop
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: tei xptr WR checker?
Wednesday, 9 April 1997
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: Query fallback critical
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Query fallback critical
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: Netscape XML story
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
Tuesday, 8 April 1997
Monday, 7 April 1997
Tuesday, 8 April 1997
Monday, 7 April 1997
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: xmllink-970406 various
- Comments on xpointers
- New links spec
- tei xptr WR checker?
Sunday, 6 April 1997
- xmllink-970406 various
- Re: Spans, and an RFI
- Re: Spans, and an RFI
- Re: Spans, and an RFI
- Re: Spans, and an RFI
Saturday, 5 April 1997
Friday, 4 April 1997
- Re: Notation System IDs
- Re: Notation System IDs
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Notation System IDs
- Re: Two more points for cleanup in existing draft
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
Thursday, 3 April 1997
Friday, 4 April 1997
Thursday, 3 April 1997
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: Comments on 31 March spec
- Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- Re: public/catalog [was: Re: ERB Decisions of March 26th]
- XML FAQ
Wednesday, 2 April 1997
- Comments on 31 March spec
- Re: ERB decision on public identifiers
- Re: Spans, and an RFI
- PS, RTF versions of WD-xml-lang-970331
- Re: ERB decision on public identifiers
- WD-xml-lang-970331 available
- Re: ERB decision on public identifiers
- ERB decision on public identifiers
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- ERB decision on comment delimiters
- ERB decision on underscores in names
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- Priorities in XML
- Re: Feature adjustment
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- April Fools RANT about Catalogs
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
Tuesday, 1 April 1997
- Gone and Past (by one who knows)
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- Re: Feature adjustment
- Re: Feature adjustment
- Re: Feature adjustment
- Re: Feature adjustment
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- Re: Feature adjustment
- Re: Feature adjustment
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: Public Identifiers, and CATALOGS
- RE: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Feature adjustment
- RE: The furore over PUBLIC
- Re: ERB call on addressing
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution
- Re: draft proposal for catalog resolution