- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 21 Apr 1997 01:21:58 +0100
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 15:04 20/04/97 +0000, Peter M-R wrote: [editors] >Agreed. This was one of the major problems of HTML - no editor. Remember of >course that an editor is very restricted unless it can read files written by >another editor. That was impossible (until recently) in HTML. I think it's actually worsening... >There is no reason which it shouldn't be possible at the start for XML. Right. I wish I had the time to write one :-) >> are to turn aside from the Avernus of HTML. >facilis descensus ... (actually it's not too bad down there) Company's good (I know a child of wealthy parents who translated the phrase as "it's so easy to slip down to the Auvergne" :-) >Maybe it's not glamorous, but it ought to make a major difference to search >engines and indexers This is one area where XML ought to shine if structured search engines like PAT can be used. ///Peter
Received on Sunday, 20 April 1997 20:21:50 UTC