public-webrtc@w3.org from January 2018 by date

Wednesday, 31 January 2018

• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Martin Thomson
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: tidy checks, missed in latest PRs. Varun Singh via GitHub
• RE: RTCIceTransport Test Bernard Aboba
• Re: RTCIceTransport Test Harald Alvestrand
• RE: WPT test dependencies Bernard Aboba
• Re: WPT test dependencies Alexandre GOUAILLARD
• [webrtc-stats] Work through implications of simulcast on the receiver side Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• RTCIceTransport Test webmaster
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Toshiya Nakakura
• [webrtc-stats] Typo - RTCLocalAudioStreamTrackStats should inherit from RTCAudioSenderStats karthikbr82 via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Cleanup: reformat the sections Varun Singh via GitHub
• Re: WPT test dependencies Harald Alvestrand
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Define object lifetimes and mention end-of-life emission Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Upgrade to respec 1.9.0.2 Vivien Lacourba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Respec issue: Locked to too old version? Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add "statslifetimeended" event Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: WPT test dependencies Sergio Garcia Murillo
• [webrtc-pc] Sort out unmute and BYE stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: WPT test dependencies Philipp Hancke

Tuesday, 30 January 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Need <section> around RTCIceTransport dictionaries Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Need <section> around dictionaries under RTCRtpSender Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: fix for timestamp for remote and local objects Varun Singh via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• [webrtc-pc] Need <section> around dictionaries under RTCRtpSender Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Gating 'unmute' events on track with transceiver direction. stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Date and time for February WebRTC VI Stefan Håkansson LK

Monday, 29 January 2018

• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Harald Alvestrand
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Cullen Jennings
• [webrtc-pc] Direction is not readonly stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: ML in WebApps Göran Eriksson AP
• Re: ML in WebApps Göran Eriksson AP
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Harald Alvestrand
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Pending remote updated by setRemote. stefan hakansson via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Codify refusing to generate an empty Offer Harald Alvestrand via GitHub

Sunday, 28 January 2018

• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Harald Alvestrand
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Harald Alvestrand

Friday, 26 January 2018

• Re: ML in WebApps Justin Uberti
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: other features Sergio Garcia Murillo
• [webrtc-stats] When are "fractionLost", "packetsLost, " "jitter", and other RFC3550-based stats updated? Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
• Re: other features Bernard Aboba
• Re: other features Cullen Jennings
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Cullen Jennings
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• ML in WebApps Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Cullen Jennings (fluffy)
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Cullen Jennings

Thursday, 25 January 2018

• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Justin Uberti
• [webrtc-stats] video packet counters should be moved out from RTCRTPStreamStats to appropriate dictionaries Varun Singh via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: fix camel case averageRtcpInterval and also put in RTCInboundRTPStreamStats Varun Singh via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: FEC sent and received metrics Varun Singh via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: moved packetsDuplicated to the right dictionary Varun Singh via GitHub
• Re: need more developer feedback Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [webrtc-stats] Deleting framesCorrupted Varun Singh via GitHub
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Emil Ivov
• Re: need more developer feedback Lennart Grahl
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Philipp Hancke
• Re: other features Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Philipp Hancke
• Re: other features Bernard Aboba
• Re: need more developer feedback Bernard Aboba
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Justin Uberti

Wednesday, 24 January 2018

• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Justin Uberti
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Michael Tuexen
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Roman Shpount
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Michael Tuexen
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Lennart Grahl
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Peter Thatcher
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Peter Thatcher
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Fixes #161 Varun Singh via GitHub
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Göran Eriksson AP
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? T H Panton
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Philipp Hancke
• Re: Doodle for February 2018 VI - reminder Stefan Håkansson LK
• RE: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Bernard Aboba
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Justin Uberti
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Justin Uberti

Tuesday, 23 January 2018

• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Iñaki Baz Castillo
• RE: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Bernard Aboba
• Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Roman Shpount
• What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API? Peter Thatcher
• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• [webrtc-stats] RTCCodecStats in getStats() is redundant. karthikbr82 via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] averageRTCPInterval should be averageRtcpInterval Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Stats need to mark up which members are required Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] CodecType "encode" / "decude" needs to default to "both" Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Lifetime of RTPStreamStats Harald Alvestrand via GitHub

Monday, 22 January 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Multiple SRDs may leave streams and tracks in unexpected state. jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] terminology: rename mediaType to kind Philipp Hancke via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Properly defined direction when creating transceiver. stefan hakansson via GitHub

Friday, 19 January 2018

• Re: QUIC use cases Justin Uberti
• Re: QUIC use cases Randell Jesup
• Re: QUIC use cases Randell Jesup
• Re: QUIC use cases T H Panton
• Re: QUIC use cases Michael Tuexen
• Re: QUIC use cases T H Panton
• Re: QUIC use cases T H Panton
• [webrtc-pc] Integrate CSP access control into algorithms Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: QUIC use cases Bernard Aboba

Thursday, 18 January 2018

• Re: QUIC use cases Justin Uberti
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Clarify that "disconnected" is transient (editorial) jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Clarify that "disconnected" is transient. jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Cullen Jennings
• [webrtc-pc] Private key access? Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Passing receiver when constructing track event in 'Processing Remote … stefan hakansson via GitHub

Wednesday, 17 January 2018

• [webrtc-stats] Missing definition of "deleted". When exactly do stats get deleted? jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Add fecPacketsSent/Received Varun Singh via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Add direction change as reason for "mute" event stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Doodle for February 2018 VI Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Alternatives to GetDeletedStats() Varun Singh
• [webrtc-stats] Rename sender/receiver/track stats henbos via GitHub
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Harald Alvestrand
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Alternatives to GetDeletedStats() Harald Alvestrand
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Convert audioLevel to double. jan-ivar via GitHub
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Martin Thomson
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Stephen Farrell

Tuesday, 16 January 2018

• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Martin Thomson
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Roman Shpount
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Stefan Håkansson LK
• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Harald Alvestrand
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Roman Shpount
• [webrtc-pc] Editorial: PendingRemoteDescription is set by.... Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Stefan Håkansson LK
• Re: Streams API (WHATWG document) Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Streams API (WHATWG document) Bernard Aboba

Monday, 15 January 2018

• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Roman Shpount
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Martin Thomson
• Re: QUIC use cases Harald Alvestrand
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Harald Alvestrand
• Re: QUIC use cases Randell Jesup
• Re: QUIC use cases Michael Tuexen
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Roman Shpount
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Roman Shpount
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Eric Rescorla
• [minutes] WebRTC WG Virtual Interim 11 January 2018 Vivien Lacourba
• RE: QUIC use cases Bernard Aboba
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Byron Campen
• Re: QUIC use cases Lennart Grahl
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• RE: QUIC use cases Bernard Aboba
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Martin Thomson

Sunday, 14 January 2018

• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Christer Holmberg

Saturday, 13 January 2018

• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Lennart Grahl
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Lennart Grahl
• Fwd: Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Lennart Grahl
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Lennart Grahl

Friday, 12 January 2018

• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Peter Thatcher
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Peter Thatcher
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Peter Thatcher
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Peter Thatcher
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Roman Shpount
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src T H Panton
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Taylor Brandstetter
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Lennart Grahl
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Peter Thatcher
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Peter Thatcher
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Peter Thatcher
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Peter Thatcher
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Peter Thatcher
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Peter Thatcher
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Peter Thatcher
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Byron Campen
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Byron Campen
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Lennart Grahl
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Harald Alvestrand
• Re: Ban ICE-LITE? Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Ban ICE-LITE? Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Harald Alvestrand
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src T H Panton
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Lennart Grahl
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src T H Panton
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src T H Panton
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src Sergio Garcia Murillo
• webRTC and Content Security Policy connect-src T H Panton

Thursday, 11 January 2018

• [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpContributingSource.audioLevel has different type and range than similar fields in webrtc-stats na-g via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Make audioLevel and voiceActivityFlag optional and non-nullable. jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Rename "objectDeleted" to something else. henbos via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Define timestamps in terms of performance.origin Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCRtpSender: Specify advise about framerate for disabled/muted tracks Adam Bergkvist via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Do not consider direction at "need negotiation" evaluation for replaceTrack stefan hakansson via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Rename RTCRTPStreamStats to RTCRtpStreamStats? henbos via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] RTCRTPStreamStats should have senderId/receiverId henbos via GitHub
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group T H Panton
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Lorenzo Miniero
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group T H Panton
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group T H Panton

Wednesday, 10 January 2018

• Re: QUIC and WebRTC Comments Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: QUIC and WebRTC Comments Peter Thatcher
• Re: QUIC and WebRTC Comments Martin Thomson
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Iñaki Baz Castillo
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Peter Thatcher
• Re: QUIC and WebRTC Comments Peter Thatcher
• [webrtc-stats] Enable continuous publication Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• Re: QUIC and WebRTC Comments Lennart Grahl
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group T H Panton
• RE: QUIC and WebRTC Comments Bernard Aboba
• Re: QUIC and WebRTC Comments Peter Thatcher
• Re: QUIC and WebRTC Comments Martin Thomson
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Peter Thatcher
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Peter Thatcher
• Re: QUIC and WebRTC Comments Peter Thatcher
• Re: QUIC and WebRTC Comments Bernard Aboba
• QUIC and WebRTC Comments Martin Thomson
• [webrtc-pc] "track" event will fire extra times if applying multiple remote offers Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub

Tuesday, 9 January 2018

• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Randell Jesup
• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: For discussion at the January 11 virtual interim: WebRTC-Quic and WebRTC-ICE drafts T H Panton
• [webrtc-pc] Possibly racy replaceTrack() henbos via GitHub
• For discussion at the January 11 virtual interim: WebRTC-Quic and WebRTC-ICE drafts Bernard Aboba

Monday, 8 January 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: replaceTrack "negotiation needed" clarification Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Whether KeyingMaterial internal slot can be stored and retrieved Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Underlying data transport explanation Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• REMINDER: WEBRTC WG Virtual Interim, January 11, 2018 at 16:00 UTC Bernard Aboba
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Lennart Grahl
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Introduction to RTP stream statistics Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] canTrickleIceCandidiates question Philipp Hancke via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Adds per-DSCP packet counters to RTP streams Harald Alvestrand via GitHub

Saturday, 6 January 2018

• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Michael Tuexen
• RE: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Bernard Aboba
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group westhawk
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Michael Tuexen
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Lennart Grahl
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Peter Thatcher
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Peter Thatcher
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Peter Thatcher

Friday, 5 January 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Defer SRD add/remove tracks until right before firing track events. jan-ivar via GitHub

Thursday, 4 January 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Define pc.getTransceivers()) et al to be in insertion order. jan-ivar via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] "a=msid" line should contain sender/receiver IDs, not track IDs henbos via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: addTrack cannot reuse a sender whose transceiver is stopped Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Remove reference from RTPSender to RTCPeerConnection Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Move operations queue definition paragraph to right section (editorial) jan-ivar via GitHub

Wednesday, 3 January 2018

• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Validation of reordered readonly parameters in setParameters Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Maximum message size slightly incorrect Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Should we require a reference from RTPSender to RTCPeerConnection? Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
• [webrtc-stats] WiFi Stats. karthikbr82 via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] enqueue an operation: is executing async? Philipp Hancke via GitHub

Tuesday, 2 January 2018

• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group T H Panton
• RE: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Bernard Aboba
• [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: replaceTrack: Never negotiate when replacing an ended track? Bernard Aboba via GitHub
• Weekly github digest (WebRTC WG specifications) W3C Webmaster via GitHub API
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group T H Panton
• [webrtc-pc] example 14: render before verifying the remote fingerprint? Philipp Hancke via GitHub
• [webrtc-pc] Example 14 never sends any media stefan hakansson via GitHub
• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Martin Thomson
• RE: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Bernard Aboba

Monday, 1 January 2018

• Re: Towards a new charter for the WebRTC Working Group Martin Thomson

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 January 2018 23:05:07 UTC