W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webrtc@w3.org > January 2018

Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API?

From: Cullen Jennings (fluffy) <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:16:53 +0000
To: Tim Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
CC: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Message-ID: <819E4038-03BF-482E-A6CD-0667CC97B121@cisco.com>

On Jan 24, 2018, at 4:17 AM, T H Panton <thp@westhawk.co.uk<mailto:thp@westhawk.co.uk>> wrote:

+1 I think we have been focusing so much on interoperability with inexistent endpoints (ice and dtls but not bundle, for example), covering edge cases and trying to map legacy technology to webrtc that we have make the simple cases extremely difficult to understand and use for the normal use cases.


Many of the existing webrtc apps rated by minutes used or revenue do have to interoperate with legacy SIP so I think some of this was time well spent for the success fo WebRTC but … big BUT … We have that in WebRTC 1.0 - great - done. I do not see any need for WebRTC 2.0 extensions to have any interoperability with SIP or 5G.

Received on Friday, 26 January 2018 18:17:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 26 January 2018 18:17:27 UTC