Re: What would you like to see in WebRTC next? A low-level API?

On 24/01/2018 22:54, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> On 24. Jan 2018, at 18:59, Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 24/01/2018 18:50, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>>> Are you referring to a non-congestion controlled way of sending unordered, unreliable datagrams?
>>> You can right now use and unordered delivery, limit the number of retransmissions to 0 and
>>> get a congestion controlled unordered unreliable datagram service...
>> Except that it can be buffered, chunked, there is no way of knowing the MTU and last time I checked didn't work as expected on any browser.. ;)
> Since it does fragmentation for you, there is no need to know the MTU. The buffering is due to
> flow and congestion control. So you want a data channel that does not have any kind of flow and
> congestion control?
>
> What did not work as you expect?
It was a while since I checked it, so I just tested latest chrome and 
indeed it works ok now, so ignore this point and thank you for 
correcting me!

Sergio

Received on Wednesday, 24 January 2018 22:03:39 UTC