- From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 22:37:38 +0100
- To: public-webrtc@w3.org
Den 26. jan. 2018 19:13, skrev Cullen Jennings (fluffy): > > >> On Jan 23, 2018, at 4:37 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net >> <mailto:ibc@aliax.net>> wrote: >> >> Honestly, I've lost interest in the spec due to the infamous time >> spent on SDP related stuff > > +1 to a solution that needs no SDP. And I don’t mean when translate SDP > to JSON or API and you still have to read the SDP documents - I mean I > do not need to read a single RFC that has the word SDP in it. > Note - the RFC process that has led to the SDP specifications for various codecs has served to tease out a number of properties of these codecs in a form where they're explainable to other people (well, nearly - I still get headaches from profile-level-id). Without reference to this or a similar process, it might be hard to reference codec properties in an interoperable way at all.
Received on Sunday, 28 January 2018 21:39:58 UTC