public-sml@w3.org from September 2007: by thread

sml 4.1 refs odd sentence on model boundary John Arwe (Sunday, 30 September)

null reference question John Arwe (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5091] distinguish between normative and non-normative content consistently and clearly in both specs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5111] 4.4 Identity Constraints and later bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5111] 4.4 Identity Constraints bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5110] sml 4.3.2.1 sml:targetElement - 4.3.2.3 sml:targetType bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5109] sml 4.3.2.0 Constraints on Targets bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5108] sml 4.3.1 sml:acyclic bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5107] sml 4.3 Constraints on References - delete redundant text bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5101] sml 4.1.2 reference semantics bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5106] sml 4.2.2 epr scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5105] sml 4.2.1 uri scheme nits bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5104] sml 4.2.1 uri scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5103] sml 4.2.0 ref schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5102] sml uri and epr schemes - refer to them consistently bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5101] sml 4.1.2 reference semantics bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5100] sml 4.1.1 reference definitions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5099] sml section 4.1 References most text should be moved into other sections bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5098] sml section 4 Schemas text should be moved into Intro bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5097] section 4 Schemas should be renamed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5096] section 4 Schemas misleading wrt what sml defines for refs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5095] inter-document references defined inconsistently bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5093] sml 3 Dependencies on Other Specifications bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5094] sml 3 Dependencies on Other Specifications bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5093] sml 3 Dependencies on Other Specifications bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5092] sml 2.2 terminology : clarify and make consistent bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

[Bug 5091] distinguish between normative and non-normative content consistently and clearly in both specs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Sunday, 30 September)

profiles not quite dead yet... should they be? John Arwe (Sunday, 30 September)

[w3c sml][agenda][ver 2] 2007-09-27 SML Teleconference John Arwe (Friday, 28 September)

Updated reference proposal Sandy Gao (Friday, 28 September)

[Bug 4872] SML shouldn't reference xpointer bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 27 September)

schema binding proposal : support for conflicting schemas Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 27 September)

RE: schema binding proposal : support for conflicting schemas Lynn, James (HP Software) (Thursday, 27 September)
- RE: schema binding proposal : support for conflicting schemas Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 27 September)

[Bug 4976] Is "multiple targets" a reference error? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 27 September)

[Bug 4865] clearly doc requirements for defining a reference scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 27 September)

[Bug 4658] How should deref() treat multiple child elements that use the same reference scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 27 September)

[Bug 4872] SML shouldn't reference xpointer bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 27 September)

[Bug 4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 26 September)

[w3c sml][agenda] 2007-09-27 SML John Arwe (Wednesday, 26 September)

SML Weekly Meeting Minutes 9/20/07 Latest version (9/26/07) Lynn, James (HP Software) (Wednesday, 26 September)

[Bug 4675] add text in section 3.2 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 26 September)

[Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 24 September)

SML Weekly Teleconference Minutes for 9/20/07 Lynn, James (HP Software) (Monday, 24 September)

RE: SML Weekly Teleconference Minutes for 9/20/07 Wilson, Kirk D (Tuesday, 25 September)
- RE: SML Weekly Teleconference Minutes for 9/20/07 Lynn, James (HP Software) (Tuesday, 25 September)

[Bug 5070] Requirement for validator to implement deref() bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 24 September)

[Bug 5069] Use of "reference" for reference elements vs. schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 24 September)

action 122 - proposal for submitting comments on bugzilla defects Valentina Popescu (Monday, 24 September)

[Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 24 September)

[Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 24 September)

[Bug 4643] inheritance of identity constraints through substitution - align with XSD? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 24 September)

[Bug 4632] Use of IRIs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 21 September)

[Bug 4638] Conformance section needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4635] sml:uri element name bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 5064] On which component(s) are SML reference constraints specified? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4632] Use of IRIs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4802] For bullet points 4,5 (...XPath expression must conform to...) we should remove the BNF and refer to the Schema spec section instead and add that the xpath expression can also include the deref() function bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4686] Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4647] smlerr:output - why exclude node sets including text nodes, PIs, comments, ... ? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 5063] Inheritance of some SML reference constraints bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4687] Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4988] Incorrect reference to schema part 2 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4638] Conformance section needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4679] Revise Section 6 in SML spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4638] Conformance section needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 5048] Where should sml:acyclic be specified? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-09-20 SML Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 20 September)

changes required for sending the draft to the webmaster Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 20 September)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2007-09-13 SML Teleconference Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 4682] Attribute based reference schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 19 September)

[Bug 4992] Object identity needs to be clarified bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 19 September)

[Bug 5025] selectorXPathType & fieldXPathType pattern facets bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 19 September)

[Bug 5048] Where should sml:acyclic be specified? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 19 September)

[Bug 4682] Attribute based reference schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 19 September)

RE: [Bug 4682] Attribute based reference schemes Kumar Pandit (Wednesday, 19 September)
- RE: [Bug 4682] Attribute based reference schemes Pratul Dublish (Wednesday, 19 September)
  - RE: [Bug 4682] Attribute based reference schemes Kumar Pandit (Wednesday, 19 September)

[Bug 4793] Restructure section 3.4 to follow the following 1) mapping from syntax to cannonical representation, 2) what constitutues a valid usage and 3) implications on instances. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 17 September)

Re: [Bug 4793] Restructure section 3.4 to follow the following 1) mapping from syntax to cannonical representation, 2) what constitutues a valid usage and 3) implications on instances. Sandy Gao (Tuesday, 18 September)
- Re: [Bug 4793] Restructure section 3.4 to follow the following 1) mapping from syntax to cannonical representation, 2) what constitutues a valid usage and 3) implications on instances. Sandy Gao (Tuesday, 18 September)

4819 Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:addres... Pratul Dublish (Monday, 17 September)

Re: 4819 Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:addres... John Arwe (Tuesday, 18 September)
- RE: 4819 Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:addres... Pratul Dublish (Tuesday, 18 September)

[Bug 4906] In 3.4, don't write deref() function into the BNF bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 17 September)

[Bug 4884] update the definition of a null reference to include the unimplemented-schemes case bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 17 September)

[Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 17 September)

[Bug 4802] For bullet points 4,5 (...XPath expression must conform to...) we should remove the BNF and refer to the Schema spec section instead and add that the xpath expression can also include the deref() function bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 17 September)

[Bug 4686] Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 17 September)

[Bug 4647] smlerr:output - why exclude node sets including text nodes, PIs, comments, ... ? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 17 September)

[Bug 4638] Conformance section needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 17 September)

[Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 17 September)

[w3c sml][minutes][ver 3] 2007-08-28 to 2007-08-30 SML F2F John Arwe (Sunday, 16 September)

possible SML use cases Ken Laskey (Saturday, 15 September)

RE: possible SML use cases Pratul Dublish (Monday, 17 September)
- Re: possible SML use cases Ken Laskey (Monday, 17 September)
  - RE: possible SML use cases Wilson, Kirk D (Wednesday, 19 September)

[Bug 4775] change process contents from skip to lax in wildcards? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 14 September)

Its time to publish 2nd draft Pratul Dublish (Friday, 14 September)

RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft Wilson, Kirk D (Saturday, 15 September)
- RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft Pratul Dublish (Saturday, 15 September)
  - latest changes to the IF document Valentina Popescu (Monday, 17 September)
    - RE: latest changes to the IF document Pratul Dublish (Monday, 17 September)
      - RE: latest changes to the IF document Valentina Popescu (Monday, 17 September)
        
        RE: latest changes to the IF document Kumar Pandit (Tuesday, 18 September)
        
        RE: latest changes to the IF document Valentina Popescu (Tuesday, 18 September)
        RE: latest changes to the IF document Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 20 September)
        RE: latest changes to the IF document Valentina Popescu (Thursday, 20 September)
RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft Wilson, Kirk D (Tuesday, 18 September)
- RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft Valentina Popescu (Tuesday, 18 September)
  - RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft Wilson, Kirk D (Tuesday, 18 September)
    - RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft Sandy Gao (Wednesday, 19 September)
      - RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft Wilson, Kirk D (Wednesday, 26 September)
RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft Kumar Pandit (Tuesday, 18 September)

[Bug 4688] Consider using xml:base bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 14 September)

[Bug 4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them more clear bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 14 September)

[Bug 4682] Attribute based reference schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 14 September)

[Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 14 September)

Re: [Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec Sandy Gao (Wednesday, 19 September)
- RE: [Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec Kumar Pandit (Wednesday, 19 September)
  - RE: [Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec John Arwe (Friday, 21 September)
    - Action 108 - tracking bugs Valentina Popescu (Monday, 24 September)
      - Re: Action 108 - tracking bugs Valentina Popescu (Thursday, 27 September)

[Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 14 September)

[Bug 4692] sml:keyref must specify either ref or refer attribute (but not both) bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 14 September)

[Bug 4802] For bullet points 4,5 (...XPath expression must conform to...) we should remove the BNF and refer to the Schema spec section instead and add that the xpath expression can also include the deref() function bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 14 September)

[w3c sml][4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them more clear Kumar Pandit (Friday, 14 September)

Re: [w3c sml][4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them more clear Valentina Popescu (Friday, 14 September)
- RE: [w3c sml][4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them more clear Pratul Dublish (Friday, 14 September)
  - RE: [w3c sml][4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them more clear Kumar Pandit (Friday, 14 September)
    - RE: [w3c sml][4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them more clear Valentina Popescu (Friday, 14 September)
      - RE: [w3c sml][4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them more clear Kumar Pandit (Friday, 14 September)

[Bug 5048] Where should sml:acyclic be specified? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 5047] Content of "dataType" in the IF schema bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 4632] Use of IRIs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

Re: [Bug 4632] Use of IRIs John Arwe (Tuesday, 18 September)
- RE: [Bug 4632] Use of IRIs Kumar Pandit (Wednesday, 19 September)

[Bug 4775] change process contents from skip to lax in wildcards? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 4688] Consider using xml:base bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 4682] Attribute based reference schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 4977] Schematron queryBinding attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[w3c sml] [4637] Construction of EPR Reference Scheme John Arwe (Thursday, 13 September)

Fw: [w3c sml] [4637] Construction of EPR Reference Scheme Valentina Popescu (Monday, 10 September)
FW: [w3c sml] [4637] Construction of EPR Reference Scheme Wilson, Kirk D (Tuesday, 11 September)
RE: [w3c sml] [4637] Construction of EPR Reference Scheme Wilson, Kirk D (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 4977] Schematron queryBinding attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 13 September)

RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 13 September)
RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 13 September)
RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Kumar Pandit (Friday, 14 September)
Re: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Sandy Gao (Wednesday, 19 September)
- RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Kumar Pandit (Wednesday, 19 September)
  - RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Pratul Dublish (Wednesday, 19 September)
  - RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Sandy Gao (Thursday, 20 September)
  - RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 John Arwe (Friday, 21 September)
    - RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Kumar Pandit (Monday, 24 September)
      - RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 John Arwe (Wednesday, 26 September)
        
        RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Pratul Dublish (Wednesday, 26 September)
        
        RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 John Arwe (Wednesday, 26 September)
        RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Pratul Dublish (Wednesday, 26 September)
        RE: [w3c sml][4665] Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 Kumar Pandit (Wednesday, 26 September)

RE: [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-07-26 SML Teleconference Kumar Pandit (Wednesday, 12 September)

[Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 12 September)

RE: [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements Wilson, Kirk D (Wednesday, 12 September)
- RE: RE: [Bug 5040] Hanlding of reference constraints on different kinds of elements Lynn, James (HP Software) (Wednesday, 12 September)

[Bug 4638] Conformance section needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 12 September)

[Bug 4637] What should we do with EPR scheme? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 12 September)

[Bug 4684] Can sml:keyref refer to an xs:key/unique? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 12 September)

[w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-09-13 SML Pratul Dublish (Wednesday, 12 September)

[Bug 4977] Schematron queryBinding attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 11 September)

[w3c sml] [minutes] 2007-09-06 SML Teleconference Jordan Boucher (Monday, 10 September)

[w3c sml][minutes][ver 2] 2007-08-28 to 2007-08-30 SML F2F John Arwe (Monday, 10 September)

[Bug 4638] Conformance section needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 September)

RE: [w3c sml] [ISSUE 4684] sml:keyref reference to xs:key/unique Wilson, Kirk D (Friday, 7 September)

RE: [w3c sml] [ISSUE 4684] sml:keyref reference to xs:key/unique Sandy Gao (Wednesday, 12 September)

[Bug 4638] Conformance section needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 September)

[Bug 5024] sml:keyref example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 September)

[Bug 4638] Conformance section needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 September)

[w3c sml] [4688] Consider using xml:base Pratul Dublish (Friday, 7 September)

Re: [w3c sml] [4688] Consider using xml:base Sandy Gao (Friday, 7 September)
- RE: [w3c sml] [4688] Consider using xml:base Pratul Dublish (Friday, 7 September)
  - RE: [w3c sml] [4688] Consider using xml:base John Arwe (Monday, 10 September)
    - RE: [w3c sml] [4688] Consider using xml:base Pratul Dublish (Monday, 10 September)
    - RE: [w3c sml] [4688] Consider using xml:base Sandy Gao (Tuesday, 11 September)
      - RE: [w3c sml] [4688] Consider using xml:base Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 13 September)

[w3c sml] [4682] Attribute based reference schemes Pratul Dublish (Friday, 7 September)

Re: [w3c sml] [4682] Attribute based reference schemes John Arwe (Monday, 10 September)
- RE: [w3c sml] [4682] Attribute based reference schemes Wilson, Kirk D (Tuesday, 11 September)
  - RE: [w3c sml] [4682] Attribute based reference schemes Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 4682] Attribute based reference schemes bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 September)

[w3c sml] [4632] Use of IRIs Pratul Dublish (Friday, 7 September)

RE: [w3c sml] [4632] Use of IRIs Pratul Dublish (Friday, 7 September)
- RE: [w3c sml] [4632] Use of IRIs Kumar Pandit (Saturday, 8 September)
  - RE: [w3c sml] [4632] Use of IRIs Pratul Dublish (Saturday, 8 September)
  - RE: [w3c sml] [4632] Use of IRIs Kumar Pandit (Friday, 14 September)
    - RE: [w3c sml] [4632] Use of IRIs Pratul Dublish (Monday, 17 September)

RE: [w3c sml] [4637] Construction of EPR Reference Scheme Pratul Dublish (Friday, 7 September)

RE: [w3c sml] [4637] Construction of EPR Reference Scheme Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Friday, 7 September)
- RE: [w3c sml] [4637] Construction of EPR Reference Scheme Valentina Popescu (Friday, 7 September)
  - RE: [w3c sml] [4637] Construction of EPR Reference Scheme Wilson, Kirk D (Saturday, 8 September)

[Bug 4632] Use of IRIs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Friday, 7 September)

[w3c sml][minutes] 2007-08-28 to 2007-08-30 SML F2F John Arwe (Friday, 7 September)

RE: [w3c sml][minutes] 2007-08-28 to 2007-08-30 SML F2F Wilson, Kirk D (Monday, 10 September)

[Bug 5024] sml:keyref example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 5026] SML does not use a profile of XML Schema 1.0 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 5027] Update Section 4.1.2.3 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 5026] SML does not use a profile of XML Schema 1.0 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4629] Relationship between SML and XPath 2.0 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4628] Relationship between SML and schema 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 5025] selectorXPathType & fieldXPathType pattern facets bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

RE: [Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 5024] sml:keyref example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

RE: [Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 6 September)
- RE: [Bug 4630] Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 Lynn, James (HP Software) (Thursday, 6 September)

html version of ginny's vote for today's telecon John Arwe (Thursday, 6 September)

RE: html version of ginny's vote for today's telecon Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4675] add text in section 3.2 to require that consumers and producers are required to implement at a minimum the uri scheme bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4638] Conformance section needed bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed Wilson, Kirk D (Thursday, 6 September)
- RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed Sandy Gao (Thursday, 6 September)
  - RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 6 September)
    - RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Friday, 7 September)
      - RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed Kumar Pandit (Friday, 7 September)
        
        RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Friday, 7 September)
        
        RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed Kumar Pandit (Saturday, 8 September)
        RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed Wilson, Kirk D (Wednesday, 12 September)
        RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 13 September)
        RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 13 September)
        RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed - consistency of rules John Arwe (Thursday, 13 September)
        RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed - consistency of rules Wilson, Kirk D (Thursday, 13 September)
        
        RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed - consistency of rules Wilson, Kirk D (Saturday, 15 September)
        
        RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed John Arwe (Tuesday, 11 September)
        RE: [Bug 4638] Conformance section needed John Arwe (Tuesday, 11 September)

[Bug 4686] Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid" bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[w3c sml] [4639] Reference cycles - document-based vs. element-based Smith, Virginia (HP Software) (Thursday, 6 September)

Re: [w3c sml] [4639] Reference cycles - document-based vs. element-based Sandy Gao (Thursday, 6 September)
- RE: [w3c sml] [4639] Reference cycles - document-based vs. element-based Lynn, James (HP Software) (Thursday, 6 September)
RE: [w3c sml] [4639] Reference cycles - document-based vs. element-based Waschke, Marvin G (Thursday, 6 September)
- RE: [w3c sml] [4639] Reference cycles - document-based vs. element-based Lynn, James (HP Software) (Thursday, 6 September)
  - RE: [w3c sml] [4639] Reference cycles - document-based vs. element-based Waschke, Marvin G (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4884] update the definition of a null reference to include the unimplemented-schemes case bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4941] support for references pointing to elements other than root elements should be optional bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4656] Restrict XPointer for SML implementations on top of relational databases? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4884] update the definition of a null reference to include the unimplemented-schemes case bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 6 September)

[Bug 4688] Consider using xml:base bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 5 September)

RE: 2007-07-26 SML Teleconference minutes question Kumar Pandit (Wednesday, 5 September)

RE: [w3c sml] [4775] Change "skip" to "lax" processing Pratul Dublish (Wednesday, 5 September)

RE: [w3c sml] [4775] Change "skip" to "lax" processing Wilson, Kirk D (Thursday, 6 September)
- RE: [w3c sml] [4775] Change "skip" to "lax" processing Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 6 September)
- RE: [w3c sml] [4775] Change "skip" to "lax" processing Pratul Dublish (Friday, 7 September)
  - RE: [w3c sml] [4775] Change "skip" to "lax" processing John Arwe (Monday, 10 September)
    - RE: [w3c sml] [4775] Change "skip" to "lax" processing Kumar Pandit (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 4884] update the definition of a null reference to include the unimplemented-schemes case bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 5 September)

RE: [Bug 4884] update the definition of a null reference to include the unimplemented-schemes case Pratul Dublish (Wednesday, 5 September)

[Bug 4673] why must SML references be derived from sml:refType? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 5 September)

[Bug 4834] targetXXX attributes and sml:refType bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 5 September)

[w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-09-06 SML Teleconference John Arwe (Wednesday, 5 September)

[Bug 4993] Remove the concept of "empty" and "dangling" references bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 5 September)

Re: [w3c sml] On recognizing, handling, and constraining SML references Sandy Gao (Wednesday, 5 September)

RE: [w3c sml] On recognizing, handling, and constraining SML references Pratul Dublish (Thursday, 6 September)
- RE: [w3c sml] On recognizing, handling, and constraining SML references Sandy Gao (Wednesday, 12 September)

[Bug 4834] targetXXX attributes and sml:refType bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 5 September)

[Bug 4673] why must SML references be derived from sml:refType? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 5 September)

Bug 4632 Use of IRIs Pratul Dublish (Tuesday, 4 September)

[Bug 4977] Schematron queryBinding attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Tuesday, 4 September)

[w3c sml] A question on "schema validity" (for MSM) Wilson, Kirk D (Monday, 3 September)

Re: [w3c sml] A question on "schema validity" (for MSM) C. M. Sperberg-McQueen (Tuesday, 4 September)

Last message date: Sunday, 30 September 2007 20:25:39 UTC