- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 18:26:29 -0400
- To: "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF1BCB7F18.AC775395-ON8525735A.007B0AFC-8525735A.007B6A6F@us.ibm.com>
disagree. the new text would for example prevent the recognition of newly defined reference schemes as smlif inter-document refs, even if based on URIs, w/o a commensurate update to SMLIF. There is a significant difference between excluding a specific case and excluding all other cases. Substituting MAY for MUST NOT would make it ok if you feel the need to make an explicit stmt about other ref schemes, but you might still need the exception for wsa:address. Best Regards, John Street address: 2455 South Road, Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601 Voice: 1+845-435-9470 Fax: 1+845-432-9787 Pratul Dublish <Pratul.Dublish@microsoft.com> Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org 09/17/2007 12:29 PM To "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org> cc Subject 4819 Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:addres... This is an attempt to instigate resolution for this bug. Here’s a proposal to resolve the bug The last para in 3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references in SML-IF Should be changed from SML-IF Consumers MUST interpret xsi:schemaLocation hints and sml:uri content used as SML reference schemes as inter-document references. SML-IF Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:address content as inter-document references. To SML-IF Consumers MUST interpret xsi:schemaLocation hints and sml:uri content used as SML reference schemes as inter-document references. SML-IF Consumers MUST NOT interpret any other content as inter-document references. Thanks! Pratul
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2007 22:26:51 UTC