[w3c sml] [agenda] 2007-09-20 SML

It is Vijay's turn to scribe.  Marv should be ready to scribe if Vijay is absent, and Zulah should be ready to scribe if Marv is absent.







Chair: when sending out an agenda, use following format



  [w3c sml][agenda] yyyy-mm-dd SML          in subject of email ([agenda]



agreed to, rest chair's convention)



Chair: when sending out an updated agenda, use following format, "n" =



update number, 1st update == 2, etc.



  [w3c sml][agenda][ver n] yyyy-mm-dd SML   in subject of email ([agenda]



[ver n] agreed to, rest chair's convention)



Scribe: read entire agenda, I restructured it so your "to do"s around the



scribe list are time-sequenced



  i.e. less to remember







The phone number to use for the SML WG teleconference is documented on the







WG's administrative home page:



http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/SML#phone







Participants are invited to join IRC channel, as documented on the WG's



administrative home page:



http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/SML#irc







Teleconference Time and Length (two hours)



Pacific   11 AM -  1 PM



Mountain  12 PM -  2 PM



Central    1 PM -  3 PM



Eastern    2 PM -  4 PM



UK         7 PM -  9 PM



Paris      8 PM - 10 PM







Proposed Agenda:







1. Roll call (present/regrets/absent)







2. Selection of Scribe based on list below



   New scribes see:



   - Scribe Quick Start Guide



http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm



   - Scribe FAQ



http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2006Oct/0001.html







Last Scribe Date  Member Name               Regrets pending



200y-mm-dd        Vijay Tewari



2007-08-09        Waschke, Marvin



2007-08-16        Smith, Virginia           9/13 through 9/27



2007-08-28        Eckert, Zulah



2007-08-28        Lynn, James



2007-08-29        Gao, Sandy



2007-08-29        Valentina Popescu



2007-08-30        Wilson, Kirk



2007-08-30        Lipton, Paul



2007-09-06        Boucher, Jordan



2007-09-13        Kumar, Pandit



2007-06-12        Tabbara, Bassam           Until 10/30/07



Exempt            Arwe, John



Exempt            Dublish, Pratul



Exempt            MSM



Exempt            PH







3. Approval of minutes from 9/13 call



http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2007Sep/att-0203/20070913-sml-minutes.mht



4. Lock down the 2nd draft of SML and SML IF specs. Chair proposes that any  "second draft" bug that is still marked as "needsAgreement" or "needsReview" at the end of this call is out of scope for the second draft.





5. Verify consensus on the editorial fixes for the following bugs
4630<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4630>

Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1

4638<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4638>

Conformance section needed

4647<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4647>

smlerr:output - why exclude node sets including text node...

4686<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4686>

Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid"

4802<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4802>

For bullet points 4,5 (...XPath expression must conform t...

4803<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4803>

Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an ins...

4884<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4884>

update the definition of a null reference to include the ...




6. Verify consensus on the following bugs




4665<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4665> Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986

4682<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4682>  Attribute based reference schemes



7. Discuss the "needsAgreement" bugs for second draft
4632<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4632>

Use of IRIs

4635<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4635>

sml:uri element name

4636<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4636>

What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers?

4637<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4637>

What should we do with EPR scheme?

4639<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4639>

Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as documen...

4658<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4658>

How should deref() treat multiple child elements that use...

4675<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4675>

add text in section 3.2 to require that consumers and pro...

4679<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4679>

Revise Section 6 in SML spec

4683<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4683>

What should deref() return when there are multiple matches

4687<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4687>

Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document

4774<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4774>

definitional schema documents should be preferentially us...

4801<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4801>

Think about making wording of bullet point 3 (if an SML i...

4807<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4807>

Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them...

4819<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4819>

Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:addres...

4823<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4823>

In 3.3.6, Replace: If neither of these cases applies, the...

5027<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5027>

Update Section 4.1.2.3






8. Discuss the remaining "needsAgreement" bugs
4643<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4643>

inheritance of identity constraints through substitution ...

4656<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4656>

Restrict XPointer for SML implementations on top of relat...

4657<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4657>

Restrict the use of deref in sml:field/@xpath for SML imp...

4684<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4684>

Can sml:keyref refer to an xs:key/unique?

4739<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4739>

5.1.3 smlerr output element node serialization

4865<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4865>

clearly doc requirements for defining a reference scheme

4872<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4872>

SML shouldn't reference xpointer


















n-3. Scribe: update scribe list below in this meeting's minutes, for use



in the next meeting's agenda:



   Update the list below and sort it (LRU), leaving people who will be out



for an extended period near the bottom



   to keep the names of draftees for the current meeting near the top, so



when the next agenda goes out people



   will know if their name is at or near the top of the list to scribe



next.







Last Scribe Date  Member Name               Regrets pending



200y-mm-dd        Vijay Tewari



2007-07-26        Kumar, Pandit



2007-08-02        Boucher, Jordan



2007-08-09        Waschke, Marvin



2007-08-16        Smith, Virginia           9/13 through 9/27



2007-08-28        Eckert, Zulah



2007-08-28        Lynn, James



2007-08-29        Gao, Sandy



2007-08-29        Valentina Popescu



2007-08-30        Wilson, Kirk



2007-08-30        Lipton, Paul







2007-06-12        Tabbara, Bassam           Until 10/30/07



Exempt            Arwe, John



Exempt            Dublish, Pratul



Exempt            MSM



Exempt            PH







n-2. Scribe: follow the steps in the Scribe Quick Start Guide through



"Generate minutes"



   http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm



   DO NOT use tools that significantly change the source html, like Word,



to do your editing.



   Those tools make compare tools to sanity check the scribe's edits



unusable even though it



   renders fine visually (even here, some like Word remove W3C style



sheets so it renders



   with subtle differences).







n-1. Scribe: (optional)



   Send the original and updated minutes to the meeting chair as an



editorial check before



   sending to the full list.  Assume the chair will use a compare tool.







n. Scribe: send the minutes to the public mailing list



   After the meeting, follow the conventions we have agreed on within the



wg to help



   people search the email archives more effectively, namely:



    [w3c sml][minutes] yyyy-mm-dd SML     in subject of email ([minutes]



agreed to, rest chair's convention)



   As with agendas, if minutes are updated include a [ver n] "tag" as



well.







----



n+1. Chair



     After meeting, update good standing list

Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 05:07:19 UTC