- From: Pratul Dublish <Pratul.Dublish@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:07:01 -0700
- To: "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <B5666F5CA5E4B64DAD8F27B615F4BE46A905C2B43C@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntd>
It is Vijay's turn to scribe. Marv should be ready to scribe if Vijay is absent, and Zulah should be ready to scribe if Marv is absent. Chair: when sending out an agenda, use following format [w3c sml][agenda] yyyy-mm-dd SML in subject of email ([agenda] agreed to, rest chair's convention) Chair: when sending out an updated agenda, use following format, "n" = update number, 1st update == 2, etc. [w3c sml][agenda][ver n] yyyy-mm-dd SML in subject of email ([agenda] [ver n] agreed to, rest chair's convention) Scribe: read entire agenda, I restructured it so your "to do"s around the scribe list are time-sequenced i.e. less to remember The phone number to use for the SML WG teleconference is documented on the WG's administrative home page: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/SML#phone Participants are invited to join IRC channel, as documented on the WG's administrative home page: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/SML#irc Teleconference Time and Length (two hours) Pacific 11 AM - 1 PM Mountain 12 PM - 2 PM Central 1 PM - 3 PM Eastern 2 PM - 4 PM UK 7 PM - 9 PM Paris 8 PM - 10 PM Proposed Agenda: 1. Roll call (present/regrets/absent) 2. Selection of Scribe based on list below New scribes see: - Scribe Quick Start Guide http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm - Scribe FAQ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-ws-policy/2006Oct/0001.html Last Scribe Date Member Name Regrets pending 200y-mm-dd Vijay Tewari 2007-08-09 Waschke, Marvin 2007-08-16 Smith, Virginia 9/13 through 9/27 2007-08-28 Eckert, Zulah 2007-08-28 Lynn, James 2007-08-29 Gao, Sandy 2007-08-29 Valentina Popescu 2007-08-30 Wilson, Kirk 2007-08-30 Lipton, Paul 2007-09-06 Boucher, Jordan 2007-09-13 Kumar, Pandit 2007-06-12 Tabbara, Bassam Until 10/30/07 Exempt Arwe, John Exempt Dublish, Pratul Exempt MSM Exempt PH 3. Approval of minutes from 9/13 call http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2007Sep/att-0203/20070913-sml-minutes.mht 4. Lock down the 2nd draft of SML and SML IF specs. Chair proposes that any "second draft" bug that is still marked as "needsAgreement" or "needsReview" at the end of this call is out of scope for the second draft. 5. Verify consensus on the editorial fixes for the following bugs 4630<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4630> Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 4638<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4638> Conformance section needed 4647<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4647> smlerr:output - why exclude node sets including text node... 4686<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4686> Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid" 4802<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4802> For bullet points 4,5 (...XPath expression must conform t... 4803<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4803> Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an ins... 4884<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4884> update the definition of a null reference to include the ... 6. Verify consensus on the following bugs 4665<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4665> Clarify URI equivalence in reference to RFC 3986 4682<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4682> Attribute based reference schemes 7. Discuss the "needsAgreement" bugs for second draft 4632<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4632> Use of IRIs 4635<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4635> sml:uri element name 4636<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4636> What should SML 3.3.1.1 say about fragment identifiers? 4637<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4637> What should we do with EPR scheme? 4639<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4639> Allow cycle checking on element graphs as well as documen... 4658<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4658> How should deref() treat multiple child elements that use... 4675<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4675> add text in section 3.2 to require that consumers and pro... 4679<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4679> Revise Section 6 in SML spec 4683<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4683> What should deref() return when there are multiple matches 4687<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4687> Handling of DTDs when composing an IF document 4774<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4774> definitional schema documents should be preferentially us... 4801<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4801> Think about making wording of bullet point 3 (if an SML i... 4807<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4807> Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them... 4819<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4819> Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:addres... 4823<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4823> In 3.3.6, Replace: If neither of these cases applies, the... 5027<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5027> Update Section 4.1.2.3 8. Discuss the remaining "needsAgreement" bugs 4643<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4643> inheritance of identity constraints through substitution ... 4656<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4656> Restrict XPointer for SML implementations on top of relat... 4657<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4657> Restrict the use of deref in sml:field/@xpath for SML imp... 4684<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4684> Can sml:keyref refer to an xs:key/unique? 4739<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4739> 5.1.3 smlerr output element node serialization 4865<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4865> clearly doc requirements for defining a reference scheme 4872<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4872> SML shouldn't reference xpointer n-3. Scribe: update scribe list below in this meeting's minutes, for use in the next meeting's agenda: Update the list below and sort it (LRU), leaving people who will be out for an extended period near the bottom to keep the names of draftees for the current meeting near the top, so when the next agenda goes out people will know if their name is at or near the top of the list to scribe next. Last Scribe Date Member Name Regrets pending 200y-mm-dd Vijay Tewari 2007-07-26 Kumar, Pandit 2007-08-02 Boucher, Jordan 2007-08-09 Waschke, Marvin 2007-08-16 Smith, Virginia 9/13 through 9/27 2007-08-28 Eckert, Zulah 2007-08-28 Lynn, James 2007-08-29 Gao, Sandy 2007-08-29 Valentina Popescu 2007-08-30 Wilson, Kirk 2007-08-30 Lipton, Paul 2007-06-12 Tabbara, Bassam Until 10/30/07 Exempt Arwe, John Exempt Dublish, Pratul Exempt MSM Exempt PH n-2. Scribe: follow the steps in the Scribe Quick Start Guide through "Generate minutes" http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm DO NOT use tools that significantly change the source html, like Word, to do your editing. Those tools make compare tools to sanity check the scribe's edits unusable even though it renders fine visually (even here, some like Word remove W3C style sheets so it renders with subtle differences). n-1. Scribe: (optional) Send the original and updated minutes to the meeting chair as an editorial check before sending to the full list. Assume the chair will use a compare tool. n. Scribe: send the minutes to the public mailing list After the meeting, follow the conventions we have agreed on within the wg to help people search the email archives more effectively, namely: [w3c sml][minutes] yyyy-mm-dd SML in subject of email ([minutes] agreed to, rest chair's convention) As with agendas, if minutes are updated include a [ver n] "tag" as well. ---- n+1. Chair After meeting, update good standing list
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2007 05:07:19 UTC