profiles not quite dead yet... should they be?

I see we still talk about "profiles", wrt Schematron specifically, in the 
latest SML draft.
I had the impression from the June F2F that we were going to scrub _all_ 
the "profile" words around all dependent specs, but I see the minutes 
indicate we only talked about doing that wrt Schema specifically.  Is 
there still any reason to call SML's use of Schematron a "profile"?  I 
believe we learned in June that it is a loaded word for some people.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2007Jun/att-0099/20070612-sml-minutes.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2007Sep/0016.html

Best Regards, John

Street address: 2455 South Road, Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601
Voice: 1+845-435-9470      Fax: 1+845-432-9787