- From: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:19:28 -0700
- To: Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com>, "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <D95F90884B51CF4F83E887862D5D3708B8D2547235@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntd>
I agree that we need to follow a consistent procedure. I followed the resolved-fixed path since it tells me that I have completed work on the bug. If the WG does not agree with the fix, the bug can always be reopened (as you correctly did). However, I am ok either way. That is, marking either resolved-fixed or keep-open after editorial change that needs review. From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sandy Gao Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 10:45 AM To: public-sml@w3.org Subject: Re: [Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec I'm slightly confused by the process. After an editor makes a change to fix a bug and the change needs to be reviewed by the WG (hence marked "needsReview"), should the bug be marked "resolved" immediately or should it be left open? Some bugs with needsReview were left open, but some others were "resolved". I had thought that they should stay "open" until the WG reviews and approves them. I was depending on my "all open SML bugs" query and never look at resolved bugs, which obviously missed a few of them. Some clarification would be appreciated. Also for those that are reviewed/approved by the WG, should its keyword be changed to something else so that they won't be caught by people's search criteria again? Thanks, Sandy Gao XML Technologies, IBM Canada Editor, W3C XML Schema WG<http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema/> Member, W3C SML WG<http://www.w3.org/XML/SML/> (1-905) 413-3255 T/L 969-3255 bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org 2007-09-14 02:19 AM To public-sml@w3.org cc Subject [Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4803 kumarp@microsoft.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 22:14:36 UTC