- From: Ken Laskey <klaskey@mitre.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 09:01:10 -0400
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- Message-Id: <D8C6E563-3CE2-41AA-A10D-00AADE49C765@mitre.org>
I've exchanged email with Jim Lynn and he thought that these looked like interesting use cases but suggested I post them to this list to get a better feel for their applicability. So here they are. Thoughts are welcome. Ken Begin forwarded message: > From: Ken Laskey <klaskey@mitre.org> > Date: September 15, 2007 8:45:27 AM EDT > To: "Lynn, James (HP Software)" <james.lynn@hp.com> > Subject: Re: Meeting minutes: 2007-09-14 > > Jim, > > I don't know a lot about SML and have not had a chance to read the > spec since a pre-Submission draft but I'm interested in what its > use might be in several scenarios: > > 1. I send a request to a data access service asking for values for > certain properties, where I specify the vocabulary in which the > property semantics are defined. The data access service finds > appropriate data sources and sends me back a response. But a bare > response with the values is of limited use if I don't know where > those values came from or how information was processed to generate > those values. it is especially a problem if I make the request > again next week and can't guarantee repeatability. Could SML be > used as a logging mechanism to tell me unambiguously how the values > were generated? Could I later submit that log and have the process > re-executed? > > 2. In the OASIS SOA Reference Model, the following is defined and > discussed > > The execution context of a service interaction is the set of > infrastructure elements, process entities, policy assertions and > agreements that are identified as part of an instantiated service > interaction, and thus forms a path between those with needs and > those with capabilities. > > Is SML a reasonable means by which to capture the execution context? > > Thanks for helping to pull some pieces together. > > Ken > > On Sep 15, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Lynn, James (HP Software) wrote: > >> Ivan et al, >> >> I am an editor on the SML WG. Just as an fyi for your group, this >> is SML 1.1, we are scheduled to release Second Public Working >> Draft next week. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jim >> >> From: w3c-semweb-cg-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-semweb-cg- >> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ken Laskey >> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 5:10 PM >> To: Ivan Herman >> Cc: W3C SW Coordination Group; Kathryn Blackmond Laskey >> Subject: Re: Meeting minutes: 2007-09-14 >> >> FYI, re Service Modeling Language (SML), see http://www.w3.org/XML/ >> SML/ >> >> Ken >> >> On Sep 14, 2007, at 11:16 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----- Ken Laskey MITRE Corporation, M/S H305 phone: 703-983-7934 7151 Colshire Drive fax: 703-983-1379 McLean VA 22102-7508
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Saturday, 15 September 2007 13:01:20 UTC