- From: Sandy Gao <sandygao@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:44:57 -0400
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF5C504ACD.F0AFA671-ON8525735B.00609E28-8525735B.00617F96@ca.ibm.com>
I'm slightly confused by the process.
After an editor makes a change to fix a bug and the change needs to be 
reviewed by the WG (hence marked "needsReview"), should the bug be marked 
"resolved" immediately or should it be left open? Some bugs with 
needsReview were left open, but some others were "resolved".
I had thought that they should stay "open" until the WG reviews and 
approves them. I was depending on my "all open SML bugs" query and never 
look at resolved bugs, which obviously missed a few of them.
Some clarification would be appreciated. Also for those that are 
reviewed/approved by the WG, should its keyword be changed to something 
else so that they won't be caught by people's search criteria again?
Thanks,
Sandy Gao
XML Technologies, IBM Canada
Editor, W3C XML Schema WG
Member, W3C SML WG
(1-905) 413-3255 T/L 969-3255
 
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org 
Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org
2007-09-14 02:19 AM
To
public-sml@w3.org
cc
Subject
[Bug 4803] Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an instance 
by evaluation the rule elements...) to refer to the schematron spec
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4803
kumarp@microsoft.com changed:
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 17:45:12 UTC