- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:34:39 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4682 sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | ------- Comment #5 from sandygao@ca.ibm.com 2007-09-19 17:34 ------- The change mentioned in comment #4 answer the immediate question about schemes that use attributes, but the new text is assuming that schemes will always uses some elements or attribute, which as far as I know has not been adopted as a requirement for defining a scheme. One example we discussed before is a scheme that always resolves to the root element of the current document, where it doesn't depend on either elements or attributes. And a scheme may want to define its behavior in terms of a processing instruction, which would seem to be a perfectly valid scheme. Suggest to use something similar to: "A reference scheme normally uses, but is not required to use, child elements, attributes or both to capture ..."
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 17:34:44 UTC