- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 17:34:39 +0000
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- CC:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4682
sandygao@ca.ibm.com changed:
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |
------- Comment #5 from sandygao@ca.ibm.com  2007-09-19 17:34 -------
The change mentioned in comment #4 answer the immediate question about schemes
that use attributes, but the new text is assuming that schemes will always uses
some elements or attribute, which as far as I know has not been adopted as a
requirement for defining a scheme.
One example we discussed before is a scheme that always resolves to the root
element of the current document, where it doesn't depend on either elements or
attributes.
And a scheme may want to define its behavior in terms of a processing
instruction, which would seem to be a perfectly valid scheme.
Suggest to use something similar to:
"A reference scheme normally uses, but is not required to use, child elements,
attributes or both to capture ..."
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2007 17:34:44 UTC