- From: Valentina Popescu <popescu@ca.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:25:09 -0400
- To: Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
- Cc: Pratul Dublish <Pratul.Dublish@microsoft.com>, "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>, public-sml-request@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF17901D0D.868755F8-ON8525735A.004F056F-8525735A.004F354F@ca.ibm.com>
The change is not on the status section. It's on section 3.4.5 - replaced smlif:baseURI with the Infoset's [base URI] property Thank you, Valentina Popescu IBM Toronto Labs Phone: (905)413-2412 (tie-line 969) Fax: (905) 413-4850 Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com> Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org 09/18/2007 01:27 AM To Valentina Popescu/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, Pratul Dublish <Pratul.Dublish@microsoft.com> cc "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org> Subject RE: latest changes to the IF document If the changes are in the ?status? section, they will not show up in the built copy till we change the status of the document to ?review?. Changes to any other section should show up in the editor?s copy. From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Valentina Popescu Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 8:17 AM To: Pratul Dublish Cc: public-sml@w3.org Subject: RE: latest changes to the IF document The file builds fine in my workspace so it may be a publish issue Thank you, Valentina Popescu IBM Toronto Labs Phone: (905)413-2412 (tie-line 969) Fax: (905) 413-4850 Pratul Dublish <Pratul.Dublish@microsoft.com> 09/17/2007 11:10 AM To Valentina Popescu/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA cc "Wilson, Kirk D" <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>, "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>, "public-sml-request@w3.org" <public-sml-request@w3.org> Subject RE: latest changes to the IF document I would say that this is not an expected behavior. I suspect that there was an error in the checkin/build/publish process. From: Valentina Popescu [mailto:popescu@ca.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 7:15 AM To: Pratul Dublish Cc: Wilson, Kirk D; public-sml@w3.org; public-sml-request@w3.org Subject: latest changes to the IF document I've made a few changes to the IF document late Friday but I don't see them appear in the editor's copy. Is that an expected behavior ? Thank you, Valentina Popescu IBM Toronto Labs Phone: (905)413-2412 (tie-line 969) Fax: (905) 413-4850 Pratul Dublish <Pratul.Dublish@microsoft.com> Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org 09/15/2007 05:55 PM To "Wilson, Kirk D" <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>, "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org> cc Subject RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft Please try once again ? I had no problems accessing the editor?s draft from http://www.w3.org/XML/SML/ From: Wilson, Kirk D [mailto:Kirk.Wilson@ca.com] Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 12:28 PM To: Pratul Dublish; public-sml@w3.org Subject: RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft Is anyone else having a problem accessing the Editor?s copies? I?m timing out when I try to open the editor?s copies on the public page. Is there another process for getting the latest draft copies so we can review the changes to date? Kirk Wilson, Ph.D. Research Staff Member CA Labs 603 823-7146 From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Pratul Dublish Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 4:38 PM To: public-sml@w3.org Subject: Its time to publish 2nd draft All We are close to our target date for publishing the second draft (which is 9/19). The editorial team is working on updating the spec to reflect the changes that were approved in yesterday?s call and expect to have a draft ready by Monday, 9/17. They have already made several changes and these are ready for review by the members. Please review the following changes made by the editorial team and send in any request for changes at the earliest and no later than 5 PM PST on 9/18 4630 Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1 4638 Conformance section needed 4647 smlerr:output - why exclude node sets including text node... 4686 Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid" 4802 For bullet points 4,5 (...XPath expression must conform t... 4803 Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an ins... 4884 update the definition of a null reference to include the ... Thanks! Pratul
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2007 14:25:26 UTC