RE: 4819 Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:addres...

John
Now  I am not sure why this bug was opened by you in the first place. Do you want to explain the issue behind this bug and propose a resolution?
Pratul

From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of John Arwe
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 3:26 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: Re: 4819 Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:addres...


disagree.  the new text would for example prevent the recognition of newly defined reference schemes as smlif inter-document refs, even if based on URIs, w/o a commensurate update to SMLIF.  There is a significant difference between excluding a specific case and excluding all other cases.  Substituting MAY for MUST NOT would make it ok if you feel the need to make an explicit stmt about other ref schemes, but you might still need the exception for wsa:address.

Best Regards, John

Street address: 2455 South Road, Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601
Voice: 1+845-435-9470      Fax: 1+845-432-9787

Pratul Dublish <Pratul.Dublish@microsoft.com>
Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org

09/17/2007 12:29 PM

To

"public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>

cc

Subject

4819           Append to 3.3.2 \"Consumers MUST NOT interpret  wsa:addres...







This is an attempt to instigate resolution for this bug.  Here’s a proposal to resolve the bug

The last para in  3.4.2 Definition of inter-document references in SML-IF

Should be changed from

SML-IF Consumers MUST interpret xsi:schemaLocation hints and sml:uri content used as SML reference schemes as inter-document references. SML-IF Consumers MUST NOT interpret wsa:address content as inter-document references.

To

SML-IF Consumers MUST interpret xsi:schemaLocation hints and sml:uri content used as SML reference schemes as inter-document references.  SML-IF Consumers MUST NOT interpret any other content as inter-document references.



Thanks!
Pratul