- From: John Arwe <johnarwe@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:12:34 -0400
- To: public-sml@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFB0EDD17F.05EE2143-ON85257352.007F87DD-85257352.007FA140@us.ibm.com>
+1 for no constraints on reference scheme definitions (remember Sandy has evil cases too... no attributes or elements required), which includes allowing attribute-based schemes Best Regards, John Street address: 2455 South Road, Poughkeepsie, NY USA 12601 Voice: 1+845-435-9470 Fax: 1+845-432-9787 Pratul Dublish <Pratul.Dublish@microsoft.com> Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org 09/07/2007 12:03 AM To "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org> cc Subject [w3c sml] [4682] Attribute based reference schemes All This is an attempt to instigate consensus on this bug. In his excellent writeup on the references, Sandy has proposed that attribute-based reference schemes be supported. FYI, sml:uri was originally an attribute and it was changed to an element to support extension points. Subsequently, the private SML WG decided to support element-based schemes only for the sake of uniformity. Please speak up now if you disagree with Sandy’s proposal. Thanks! Pratul
Received on Monday, 10 September 2007 23:12:51 UTC