Re: [w3c sml] On recognizing, handling, and constraining SML references

> Team, 
> 
> This is to start the discussion around many reference related bugs, 
> including 4658, 4673, 4682, 4683, 4780/4795, 4834, 4865, 4884, 4976.
> (4780 seems to be a duplicate of 4795.) 
> 
> I'm attaching both HTML and PDF. Pick your favorite format. :-) 

I've updated the proposal based on discussions we had during the F2F. Pick 
the format (HTML vs. PDF) and the flavor (plain vs. diffed) you like.

My understanding about where we are:
- We have agreement on sections 1, 2, 4, and 5.
- We answered 2 out of 3 non-reference related questions (section 6).
- Some members are not entirely certain about section 3.
- The only other question we need to answer is "defaulted sml:ref" (in 
section 6).




Thanks,
Sandy Gao
XML Technologies, IBM Canada
Editor, W3C XML Schema WG
Member, W3C SML WG
(1-905) 413-3255 T/L 969-3255