[Bug 4673] why must SML references be derived from sml:refType?

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4673


pratul.dublish@microsoft.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|sandygao@ca.ibm.com         |virginia.smith@hp.com
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |NEW
           Keywords|needsAgreement              |editorial




------- Comment #1 from pratul.dublish@microsoft.com  2007-09-05 04:56 -------
We decided at Toronto F2F that sml:refType is no longer needed. Any complex
type can be used as a reference type and targetXXX and acyclic constraints can
be defined for it. These constraints will only be validated for instances of
the complex type for which sml:ref="true" or "1"

Received on Wednesday, 5 September 2007 04:56:36 UTC