RE: latest changes to the IF document

I would say that this is not an expected behavior. I suspect that there was an error in the checkin/build/publish process.

From: Valentina Popescu [mailto:popescu@ca.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2007 7:15 AM
To: Pratul Dublish
Cc: Wilson, Kirk D; public-sml@w3.org; public-sml-request@w3.org
Subject: latest changes to the IF document


I've made a few changes to the IF document late Friday but I don't see them appear in the editor's copy. Is that an expected behavior ?


Thank you,
Valentina Popescu
IBM Toronto Labs
Phone:  (905)413-2412         (tie-line  969)
Fax: (905) 413-4850


Pratul Dublish <Pratul.Dublish@microsoft.com>
Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org

09/15/2007 05:55 PM

To

"Wilson, Kirk D" <Kirk.Wilson@ca.com>, "public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>

cc

Subject

RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft







Please try once again - I had no problems accessing the editor's draft from http://www.w3.org/XML/SML/

From: Wilson, Kirk D [mailto:Kirk.Wilson@ca.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 12:28 PM
To: Pratul Dublish; public-sml@w3.org
Subject: RE: Its time to publish 2nd draft

Is anyone else having a problem accessing the Editor's copies?  I'm timing out when I try to open the editor's copies on the public page.

Is there another process for getting the latest draft copies so we can review the changes to date?

Kirk Wilson, Ph.D.
Research Staff Member
CA Labs
603 823-7146


________________________________

From: public-sml-request@w3.org [mailto:public-sml-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Pratul Dublish
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 4:38 PM
To: public-sml@w3.org
Subject: Its time to publish 2nd draft

All
We are close to our target date for publishing the second draft (which is 9/19). The editorial team is working on updating the spec to reflect the changes that were approved in yesterday's call and expect to have a draft ready by Monday, 9/17.  They have already made several changes and these are ready for review by the members.  Please review the following changes made by the editorial team and send in  any request for changes  at the earliest and no later than 5 PM PST on 9/18

4630<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4630>

Clarify relation of SML and XML 1.0 vs 1.1

4638<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4638>

Conformance section needed

4647<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4647>

smlerr:output - why exclude node sets including text node...

4686<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4686>

Use schema terminorlogies to describe "xml schema valid"

4802<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4802>

For bullet points 4,5 (...XPath expression must conform t...

4803<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4803>

Edit bullet point (A pattern MUST be evaluated for an ins...

4884<http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4884>

update the definition of a null reference to include the ...




Thanks!
Pratul