Re: [w3c sml][4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can make them more clear

One thing that strikes me while reading the defect is that there is not 
enough description to understand what the problem is. I vaguely recall 
some discussions during the June f2f meeting around the usage of the SML 
error output on attributes such as the applicationURI, but none of these 
things are recorded here so I can?t guarantee that this is what this 
defect refers to.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4807

With the information I have at this time, my view on this defect is that 
it is not ready for editorial updates. I propose to move it back to 
needsAgreement and have somebody write down the issues so that we can 
investigate them. 

Thank you,
Valentina Popescu
IBM Toronto Labs
Phone:  (905)413-2412         (tie-line  969)
Fax: (905) 413-4850




Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com> 
Sent by: public-sml-request@w3.org
09/13/2007 10:23 PM

To
"public-sml@w3.org" <public-sml@w3.org>
cc
Kumar Pandit <kumarp@windows.microsoft.com>
Subject
[w3c sml][4807] Look at sections in section 5 and see if we can  make them 
more clear






The section 5 in the title has now become section 6 : ?Structured XML 
Output from Schematron Rules?.
 
I propose that we should remove this section entirely rather than spending 
time fixing/clarifying it. There are a couple of reasons:
1.       Support for structured xml output is optional. It will be more 
productive to spend our time on core (non-optional) SML issues. If we have 
lot of time left after fixing all core issues, we can discuss whether to 
bring this back.
2.       It is strange that the SML spec even attempts to define this. 
This should either be implementation dependent or should be the 
responsibility of the schematron spec to define.
 
Please let me know if you disagree.