public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from March 2010 by date

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

• Editor's Drafts Updated Shane McCarron
• Maintenance of the XHTML Vocabulary document Shane McCarron
• Re: Implementation of the new features... Manu Sporny
• Implementation of the new features... Ivan Herman
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 1st April 2010, 1400 UTC Ivan Herman
• Purely admin issue (Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat) Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa DOM API commited to CVS Benjamin Adrian
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Henri Sivonen
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Tab Atkins Jr.

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Shelley Powers
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Shelley Powers

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 1st April 2010, 1400 UTC Mark Birbeck
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 1st April 2010, 1400 UTC Mark Birbeck
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Edward O'Connor
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Julian Reschke
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Julian Reschke
• Telecon Agenda - 1st April 2010, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Monday, 29 March 2010

• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Toby Inkster
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Shane McCarron
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Ivan Herman
• Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Shane McCarron
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa Core and RDF/XML Toby Inkster
• Re: RDFa Core and RDF/XML Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Core and RDF/XML Mark Birbeck
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa Core and RDF/XML Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Core and RDF/XML Mark Birbeck
• RDFa Core and RDF/XML Ivan Herman
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Ivan Herman
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Ivan Herman
• Re: Introductions Mark Birbeck

Sunday, 28 March 2010

• The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat Manu Sporny
• Support declaration of prefixes in RDFa Profile documents? Manu Sporny
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Shane McCarron
• Re: @vocab Martin McEvoy
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Toby Inkster
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Manu Sporny
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Shane McCarron
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Manu Sporny
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Manu Sporny
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Manu Sporny
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Manu Sporny
• Re: @vocab Manu Sporny

Saturday, 27 March 2010

• ISSUE-13: Empty @typeof...let's not lose this one again [was: two side issues on blank nodes...] Manu Sporny
• Re: Empty @typeof...let's not lose this one again [was: two side issues on blank nodes...] Ivan Herman
• Empty @typeof...let's not lose this one again [was: two side issues on blank nodes...] Mark Birbeck
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Ivan Herman
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Toby Inkster
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Ivan Herman
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Shane McCarron
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Toby Inkster

Friday, 26 March 2010

• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Ivan Herman
• two side issues on blank nodes... Ivan Herman
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Shane McCarron
• Re: New version of @profile and @vocab Ivan Herman
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Sebastian Heath
• Re: New version of @profile and @vocab Toby Inkster
• Re: New version of @profile and @vocab Manu Sporny
• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Manu Sporny
• Re: New version of @profile and @vocab Ivan Herman
• Re: New version of @profile and @vocab Toby Inkster

Thursday, 25 March 2010

• Re: A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Ivan Herman
• New version of @profile and @vocab Ivan Herman
• A rose by any other name is just as thorny... Shane McCarron
• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-03-18 Manu Sporny
• Re: Chat with Ivan on RDFa 1.1 Authoring features Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Chat with Ivan on RDFa 1.1 Authoring features Ivan Herman
• Re: Chat with Ivan on RDFa 1.1 Authoring features Toby Inkster
• Re: Chat with Ivan on RDFa 1.1 Authoring features Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

• Re: Chat with Ivan on RDFa 1.1 Authoring features Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Chat with Ivan on RDFa 1.1 Authoring features Toby Inkster
• Re: Chat with Ivan on RDFa 1.1 Authoring features Ivan Herman
• Re: @vocab Ivan Herman
• Re: epub as a use case? Ivan Herman
• @vocab Sebastian Heath
• Chat with Ivan on RDFa 1.1 Authoring features Manu Sporny
• Re: epub as a use case? Markus Gylling
• Re: epub as a use case? Manu Sporny
• epub as a use case? Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

• Re: Scribed telecon discussion with Ben Ben Adida
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Telecon Agenda - 25th March 2010, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• Scribed telecon discussion with Ben Manu Sporny

Monday, 22 March 2010

• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Manu Sporny
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Toby Inkster
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Mark Birbeck
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Mark Birbeck
• Re: The Deferred Resolution Graph Ivan Herman
• Re: A new approach to accomplishing RDFa Profiles Ivan Herman
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Ivan Herman
• Straw poll for RDFa 1.1 FPWD improvements Manu Sporny
• Re: a 'loose' vocab proposal Martin McEvoy

Sunday, 21 March 2010

• Re: Ontology Mixing Melvin Carvalho
• Re: Ontology Mixing Manu Sporny
• Re: Ontology Mixing (was: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map) Melvin Carvalho
• Ontology Mixing (was: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map) Manu Sporny
• Re: a 'loose' vocab proposal Manu Sporny
• Re: The Deferred Resolution Graph (was: Re: A new approach to accomplishing RDFa Profiles) Mark Birbeck
• Re: A new approach to accomplishing RDFa Profiles Manu Sporny
• The Deferred Resolution Graph (was: Re: A new approach to accomplishing RDFa Profiles) Manu Sporny
• Re: Issues with @token scoping and hidden-data Manu Sporny

Saturday, 20 March 2010

• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Toby Inkster
• a 'loose' vocab proposal Martin McEvoy
• Re: A new approach to accomplishing RDFa Profiles Mark Birbeck
• Re: A new approach to accomplishing RDFa Profiles Ivan Herman
• Re: Issues with @token scoping and hidden-data Ivan Herman
• Issues with @token scoping and hidden-data Manu Sporny
• RDFa Profiles and Dublin Core Application Profiles Manu Sporny
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Manu Sporny
• Re: Scheduling separate telecon with Ben/Ivan Manu Sporny
• Re: A new approach to accomplishing RDFa Profiles Manu Sporny

Friday, 19 March 2010

• exclude-prefixes was: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Shane McCarron
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Shane McCarron
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Shane McCarron
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Toby Inkster
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: A new approach to accomplishing RDFa Profiles Ivan Herman
• Re: Scheduling separate telecon with Ben/Ivan Ivan Herman

Thursday, 18 March 2010

• Re: Scheduling separate telecon with Ben/Ivan Mark Birbeck
• Re: A new approach to accomplishing RDFa Profiles Mark Birbeck
• A new approach to accomplishing RDFa Profiles Manu Sporny
• Scheduling separate telecon with Ben/Ivan Manu Sporny
• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-03-18 Manu Sporny
• ACTION-12: Fix descriptions of mailing lists Manu Sporny
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 18th March 2010, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• RDFa DOM API commited to CVS Manu Sporny

Wednesday, 17 March 2010

• Re: Telecon Agenda - 18th March 2010, 1500 UTC Knud Hinnerk Möller
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Ivan Herman
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Manu Sporny
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Manu Sporny

Tuesday, 16 March 2010

• Re: Telecon Agenda - 18th March 2010, 1500 UTC Toby Inkster
• Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Ben Adida
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Mark Birbeck
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Ben Adida
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Shane McCarron
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Toby Inkster
• Fwd: potential grammatical error(s) in latest draft Manu Sporny
• Cool rdfQuery application Manu Sporny
• Re: Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Another way other than @profile, @vocab or @map Martin McEvoy
• Telecon Agenda - 18th March 2010, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny

Monday, 15 March 2010

• RDF or key-value pairs (on ISSUE-1) Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-1 Proposal: RDFa Profiles via the RDFa Vocabulary, bonus: the @map attribute Manu Sporny
• Re: Does RDFa processing recurse into content:encoded? Stephane Corlosquet
• Re: ISSUE-1 Proposal: RDFa Profiles via the RDFa Vocabulary, bonus: the @map attribute Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-1 Proposal: RDFa Profiles via @map Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-1 Proposal: RDFa Profiles via the RDFa Vocabulary, bonus: the @map attribute Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-1 Proposal: RDFa Profiles via @map Manu Sporny
• Re: Does RDFa processing recurse into content:encoded? Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-20 (Deep Processing of XMLLiterals): XMLLiteral content isn't processed for RDFa attributes in RDFa 1.0 - should this change in RDFa 1.1? [RDFa 1.1 Core] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker

Sunday, 14 March 2010

• Re: ISSUE-1: Using RDF to express tokens/keywords Mark Birbeck
• ISSUE-1: Using RDF to express tokens/keywords Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Mark Birbeck
• Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document Mark Birbeck
• Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Mark Birbeck
• Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Ivan Herman

Saturday, 13 March 2010

• Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document Manu Sporny
• RDFa Test Suite online again, works in Google Chrome now Manu Sporny

Friday, 12 March 2010

• Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Mark Birbeck
• Re: Does RDFa processing recurse into content:encoded? Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-1: What happens when you can't dereference a profile document? Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Ivan Herman
• Re: Does RDFa processing recurse into content:encoded? Toby Inkster
• Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Toby Inkster
• Re: Microdata support in Google Julian Reschke
• Microdata support in Google Ivan Herman

Thursday, 11 March 2010

• Re: ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Ben Adida
• Re: Does RDFa processing recurse into content:encoded? Stephane Corlosquet
• Re: ISSUE-1: What happens when you can't dereference a profile document? Toby Inkster
• Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document Mark Birbeck
• Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document Toby Inkster
• Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-1: Backward compatibility issues Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-1: Default profile document Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document Mark Birbeck
• ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-1: What happens when you can't dereference a profile document? Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-1: Format of the profile document Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-1: Status of RDFa Profiles Manu Sporny
• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-03-11 Manu Sporny
• Minutes 2010-03-11 Steven Pemberton
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 11th March 2010, 1500 UTC Markus Gylling
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 11th March 2010, 1500 UTC Mark Birbeck
• Re: Directions of the RDFa DOM API Benjamin Adrian
• Re: Directions of the RDFa DOM API Ivan Herman
• Re: RDF TripleStores API Ivan Herman
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

• RDF TripleStores API Toby Inkster
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Toby Inkster
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Mark Birbeck
• Directions of the RDFa DOM API Benjamin Adrian
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 9 March 2010

• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ben Adida
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ben Adida
• Re: ISSUE-1: JSONP as a vocabulary encoding format Ben Adida
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-1: JSONP as a vocabulary encoding format msporny
• Telecon Agenda - 11th March 2010, 1500 UTC msporny

Monday, 8 March 2010

• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ben Adida
• Re: Introductions Nathan Yergler
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Shane McCarron
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ben Adida
• Re: Javascript Security for Dummies Ben Adida
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations Shane McCarron
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations Ben Adida
• Fwd: Daylight Saving Time start for 2010 Ivan Herman
• Re: Gov 2.0 New England conference Ivan Herman

Sunday, 7 March 2010

• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Mark Birbeck
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Mark Birbeck

Saturday, 6 March 2010

• Re: Gov 2.0 New England conference Mark Birbeck
• Gov 2.0 New England conference Jeff Sonstein
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman

Friday, 5 March 2010

• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Toby Inkster
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Mark Birbeck
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Mark Birbeck
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Shane McCarron
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman
• Re: attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Mark Birbeck
• attempting to merge the 'vocab' and 'profile' documents Ivan Herman
• Re: Javascript Security for Dummies Ivan Herman
• Re: Javascript Security for Dummies Mark Birbeck
• Re: Javascript Security for Dummies Toby Inkster
• Re 2: Javascript Security for Dummies Ivan Herman
• Re: Javascript Security for Dummies Ivan Herman
• Re: Javascript Security for Dummies Benjamin Adrian

Thursday, 4 March 2010

• Re: Javascript Security for Dummies Mark Birbeck
• Javascript Security for Dummies Toby Inkster
• RDFa WG telecon minutes for 2010-03-04 Manu Sporny
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• Re: ISSUE-1 compare and contrast Vocabularies and Profiles proposals Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-1 compare and contrast Vocabularies and Profiles proposals Manu Sporny
• Re: Introductions Markus Gylling
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC Ivan Herman
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC Shane McCarron
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-1 compare and contrast Vocabularies and Profiles proposals Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-1 compare and contrast Vocabularies and Profiles proposals Manu Sporny
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations Manu Sporny
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• Re: client-side storage APIs and RDFa API? Manu Sporny

Wednesday, 3 March 2010

• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations Mark Birbeck
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations Mark Birbeck
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations Mark Birbeck
• Re: Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC Mark Birbeck
• Introduction Toby Inkster

Tuesday, 2 March 2010

• Telecon Agenda - 4th March 2010, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny

Monday, 1 March 2010

• Re: ISSUE-18 (ODF integration): Determine how ODF will integrate RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 Core] Toby Inkster
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations Ivan Herman
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-19 (Default generation of XMLLiterals): Should RDFa 1.1 generate XMLLiterals or plain literals for content that contains elements [RDFa 1.1 Core] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations Shane McCarron
• Proposal for ISSUE-11: Default prefix declarations Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-18 (ODF integration): Determine how ODF will integrate RDFa 1.1 [RDFa 1.1 Core] RDFa Working Group Issue Tracker

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 18:25:52 UTC