Re: The next HTML+RDFa Heartbeat

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote:
> A few minor points of clarification on which documents that RDFa WG is
> responsible for publishing. Some thought that I was implying that the
> RDFa WG would be generating all of the "thin" specifications below. The
> only two documents in the list below that the RDFa WG is chartered to
> create are RDFa Core 1.1 and XHTML+RDFa.
> 
> On 03/28/10 16:38, Manu Sporny wrote:
>> We're going for a spec hierarchy that looks like this, with all of the
>> XYZ+RDFa specs being very "thin" documents that layer on top of RDFa
>> Core 1.1:
>> 
>>                   +--------- HTML+RDFa
>>                   +--------- SVG+RDFa
>> RDFa Core 1.1 ----+--------- EPUB+RDFa
>>                   +--------- ODF+RDFa
>>                   +--------- XHTML+RDFa
> 
> Additionally, RDFa has not yet been accepted as EPUB's metadata
> expression mechanism, but it's in the running. It was mentioned as
> another example of possible language integration for RDFa.
> 
> It is understood that all other documents should be created and
> controlled by their respective Working Groups. To be very specific:
> 
> RDFa Core 1.1 - created and published by RDFa WG @ W3C
> HTML+RDFa - created and published by HTML WG @ W3C
> SVG+RDFa - created and published by SVG WG @ W3C
> EPUB+RDFa - possibly created and published by EPUB WG @ IDPF
> ODF+RDFa - created and published by ODF TC @ Oasis
> XHTML+RDFa - created and published by RDFa WG @ W3C
> 
> -- manu

That's an impressive number of documents. RDFa's reach is certainly
progressing nicely.

Congrats on all of the hard work, Manu.

> 
> --
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)


Shelley